Skip to main content

Security report for robertsonmarketing.com

Robertson Marketing Group, Inc. · E-commerce · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Robertson Marketing Group, Inc. is a well-established B2B company specializing in global ecommerce platforms, fulfillment, rewards, and incentive programs. With a domain age dating back to 1998 and notable clients such as Google and UPS, the company holds a solid market position in the ecommerce and brand merchandising sectors. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses seeking comprehensive ecommerce and loyalty solutions. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, hosted on Microsoft Azure DNS infrastructure, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of security headers indicate compliance and security gaps. The WHOIS data supports legitimacy with consistent registration details and domain age. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching robertsonmarketing.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Robertson Marketing operates in the ecommerce and retail services sector, providing cloud-based platforms and fulfillment services tailored to global B2B clients. Their competitive advantage lies in decades of experience, strategic partnerships, and a comprehensive service offering including employee recognition and brand experiences. The company targets medium to large enterprises requiring integrated ecommerce and loyalty solutions. Their partnership ecosystem includes major brands, and their operational footprint spans multiple US cities and international locations. Growth indicators include a diverse portfolio of case studies and a focus on managed services. The business model is service-oriented with revenue streams from platform deployment, fulfillment, and consulting.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts highlight areas for improvement. The use of HTTPS is implied but not confirmed in the data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks GDPR compliance indicators such as privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance risk. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting transparency and trust in security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to harden against common web attacks.
  4. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations to secure data in transit.
  5. Establish and publicize incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Robertson Marketing Group, Inc.
Description
Robertson Marketing offers global platforms for e-commerce and employee and customer loyalty. Their solutions include cloud based technology platforms, strategic partners worldwide, in-country distribution centers, and professional services tailored to global footprints.
Key services
Global ecommerce platforms, Employee and customer loyalty programs, Fulfillment and logistics services, Brand merchandising and promotional products, Managed services and professional consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API, jQuery 1.12.4, Isotope.js, Lightcase.js, Froogaloop2 (Vimeo API), CSS with Google Fonts (Poppins)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant business content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is present but no contact forms detected in the provided HTML.
  4. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown but domain uses HTTPS URLs.
  5. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and not privacy protected, supporting trust.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking without explicit consent mechanisms.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of legacy and modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.12.4, Isotope.js, and Lightcase.js, integrated with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The hosting DNS is managed via Microsoft Azure DNS servers, indicating a reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive CSS and Google Fonts integration. Performance is moderate, with video backgrounds and multiple scripts potentially impacting load times. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph images, but accessibility features are basic. Technical debt is moderate due to older jQuery version and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with robertsonmarketing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review robertsonmarketing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.