Skip to main content

Security report for rms.ltd

Rock Management Services · Other · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rock Management Services Ltd. is a UK-based company offering comprehensive business support services to organizations aiming to remain lean and focus on their core operations. Their service portfolio includes administrative support across HR, IT, finance, compliance, and consulting, positioning them as a trusted outsourcing partner with a proven track record and senior experienced personnel. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to business clients. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, and Google Analytics integrations, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and employs cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating awareness of privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility basics in place. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent banners but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a domain naming error, which is unusual but does not appear to affect the legitimacy of the website. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and WHOIS data clarity would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rms.ltd

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rock MS operates in the business support outsourcing sector, targeting organizations that prefer to focus on core services while outsourcing administrative functions. Their competitive advantage lies in quality-assured services, senior expertise, and bespoke software solutions. The company maintains a clear UK market focus with a registered office in Oxfordshire. Their partnership with Bedrock Software suggests an ecosystem approach to service delivery. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts across multiple administrative domains. The website's professional presentation and comprehensive service listing indicate a stable market position with potential for growth in SME segments.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and social sharing plugins introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is accurate to reinforce legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rock Management Services Ltd.
Registration number
4439748
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rock Management Services
Description
business support to organisations wanting to remain lean and focus on their core services.
Key services
Accounts, Tax & Payroll, Cashiering & Billing, Change Management, Compliance Services, Facilities, HR Services, IT Services, Marketing Services, Quality & Auditing, Qualifications & Insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Beautiful and Responsive Cookie Consent, Sassy Social Share, Max Mega Menu, AOS (Animate On Scroll)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Sassy Social Share
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional business support services site with clear navigation and content
  3. Uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  4. Includes cookie consent and privacy policies indicating GDPR awareness
  5. WHOIS data is missing or inaccessible due to domain naming error
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content
  7. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn confirmed
  8. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Slider Revolution for dynamic content presentation, and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site uses jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements and is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load speed by optimizing scripts and images. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rms.ltd. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rms.ltd.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.