Skip to main content

Security report for rlfarchitects.com

Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc. · Other · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc. (RLF Architects) is a well-established architecture, engineering, and interior design firm based in Orlando, Florida, with a history spanning over 90 years. The company specializes in integrated design services with a strong focus on healthcare, education, cultural, and federal sectors. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, showcasing a portfolio of projects and emphasizing their expertise and leadership in healthcare architecture. The firm targets clients requiring comprehensive design solutions, particularly in complex and critical facility environments. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Splide.js for sliders, and Vimeo for embedded videos. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and features good navigation and content structure, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers, published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy and terms of service are present, there is no cookie consent mechanism or clear GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information such as emails and phone numbers are not directly visible on the homepage, which may impact user trust and accessibility. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid business credibility and digital maturity but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rlfarchitects.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RLF Architects holds a strong market position as a specialized design firm with a dominant focus on healthcare projects, comprising over 80% of their portfolio. Their integrated approach combining architecture, engineering, and interior design provides competitive advantages in delivering cohesive solutions. The business model centers on professional services targeting institutional clients such as healthcare providers, educational institutions, cultural organizations, and federal agencies. The firm's longevity and 90th anniversary celebration indicate stability and experience. Their partnership with platforms like Newforma for project repository suggests a mature operational ecosystem. Social media engagement across major platforms supports brand visibility and client outreach. Growth indicators include a diverse project portfolio and emphasis on future projects. However, the lack of direct contact details on the homepage may limit immediate client engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security posture. HTTPS is used consistently, ensuring encrypted communications. No sensitive data or credentials are exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which is a missed opportunity for responsible vulnerability management. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and explicit GDPR adherence indicators. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements in security best practices and compliance documentation are recommended to enhance the security maturity and trustworthiness of the site.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and user data rights.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Create and host a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rogers, Lovelock & Fritz, Inc.
Description
RLF Architects is a fully-integrated team of architects, engineers, interior designers, and planners that shares a passion for creating exceptional, high-performing spaces.
Key services
Architecture, Engineering, Interior Design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Vimeo Player API, Splide.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by external scripts and assets loaded via HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on healthcare sector projects.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via contact page.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and multimedia content.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Splide.js for interactive elements and Vimeo API for video embedding. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads assets from a CDN, improving performance and reliability. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and adaptive content. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but the lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates areas for technical enhancement to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rlfarchitects.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rlfarchitects.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.