Skip to main content

Security report for rightmessage.com

RightMessage · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RightMessage is a specialized SaaS platform focused on personalized marketing for creators and marketers. It offers tools for audience segmentation, personalized content delivery, and conversion optimization, positioning itself as a trusted solution with over 1000 creators using its services. The platform integrates with major email marketing providers and employs modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which is a significant security concern. While privacy and terms of service documents are present, advanced compliance features like cookie consent mechanisms and strict GDPR policies are limited. Overall, the business demonstrates strong credibility and professionalism but should prioritize improving its security posture to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rightmessage.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rightmessage.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, targeting professional creators and marketers who seek to improve their marketing effectiveness through personalization. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS, offering a suite of tools including smart forms, quizzes, personalized recommendations, and data-driven insights. The presence of case studies and testimonials from notable creators enhances its market positioning. The integration ecosystem includes major platforms like Mailchimp, HubSpot, and ActiveCampaign, which broadens its appeal and functionality. Founded in 2017, the company appears to be a small but established player in the personalized marketing space.

Security posture

The current security posture reveals critical gaps, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which expose users to potential risks and undermine trust. The lack of HSTS and OCSP stapling further weakens the security framework. Although no major vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the missing HTTPS implementation is a critical issue that must be addressed immediately. The DMARC policy is set to 'none', indicating limited email authentication enforcement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are found, suggesting room for improvement in security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable secure HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and disable outdated or insecure versions.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with preload to enforce secure connections.
  4. Add a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance DMARC policy to a stricter enforcement level to improve email security.
  6. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to build trust.
  7. Regularly audit and update security configurations to adhere to best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern technologies including Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework), Tailwind CSS for styling, and Font Awesome for icons. It leverages third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Fathom Analytics, PostHog for analytics, and FirstPromoter for affiliate tracking. The hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. However, the current SSL/TLS configuration is invalid, and the site lacks HTTPS enforcement, which is a significant technical risk. Performance is moderate to slow with a load time of over 7 seconds and a large page size (~3MB), suggesting optimization opportunities. SEO and accessibility are generally good, with proper meta tags and responsive design. The site includes multiple integrations and external resources, indicating a complex but well-structured technical environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +4Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 69/100 +3Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rightmessage.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rightmessage.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.