Skip to main content

Security report for rifel-institut.de

R.I.F.E.L. Research Institute for Exhibition and Live-Communication e.V. · Other · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

R.I.F.E.L. Research Institute for Exhibition and Live-Communication e.V. is a small, Germany-based non-profit organization specializing in research within the exhibition and live communication sectors. The website serves as a platform to showcase their research activities, provide access to an online shop, and offer contact channels for stakeholders. Their market position is niche, targeting professionals and organizations involved in exhibitions and live events. The business model combines research services with e-commerce capabilities, supporting their mission and outreach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and PHP. Hosting is managed via Corpex DNS, and the site employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. The presence of Jetpack and WooCommerce analytics indicates moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency would enhance compliance and security posture, supporting the organization's credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rifel-institut.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The R.I.F.E.L. Institute operates in a specialized research niche focused on exhibition and live communication industries. Their competitive advantage lies in their focused research offerings and integration of an online shop to support their activities. The business targets industry professionals and organizations seeking data-driven insights and resources. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, research services, and product sales via the shop. The partnership ecosystem includes social media engagement on Facebook and LinkedIn, enhancing outreach. Growth indicators are moderate given the niche focus and small organizational size. The website's clear structure and contact channels support effective stakeholder engagement and operational transparency.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices are partially addressed via a privacy policy, but lack of cookie consent mechanisms indicates incomplete GDPR compliance. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the HTML content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are minimal, suggesting room for improvement in organizational security awareness and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to ensure full GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
R.I.F.E.L. Research Institute for Exhibition and Live-Communication e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
R.I.F.E.L. Research Institute for Exhibition and Live-Communication e.V.
Description
Research institute focused on exhibition and live communication sectors, offering research, a shop, and contact services.
Key services
Research studies, Online shop, Information and contact services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, PHP, CSS, JavaScript
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats, WooCommerce Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats (stats.wp.com), WooCommerce Analytics
Marketing tools
WooCommerce, Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in German language.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  10. No critical security issues detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a standard WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, supported by jQuery and standard web technologies. Hosting is managed through Corpex DNS, indicating a professional hosting environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. The site uses modern fonts and includes social media integration. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rifel-institut.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rifel-institut.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.