Skip to main content

Security report for rflfair.com

RFL Fuar · Other · Turkey

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RFL Fuar is a Turkish company specializing in organizing trade fairs and exhibitions, serving the Turkish foreign trade and industry sectors since 2006. The website reflects a business-focused approach with clear service offerings and contact information, targeting businesses and professionals interested in trade events. The domain is mature and consistent with the company's history, enhancing credibility. Technically, the website employs a range of common front-end libraries and frameworks such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Owl Carousel, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, there is no detected CMS or advanced analytics, indicating a relatively simple but functional technical infrastructure. Mobile optimization and navigation clarity are good, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance documentation, which are critical for modern web security and regulatory adherence. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and DNS hosting provider, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no vulnerabilities were immediately apparent in the HTML content. Overall, the website is functional and credible but requires improvements in security posture and privacy compliance to reduce risk and enhance trustworthiness. Strategic enhancements in these areas would benefit the company's digital maturity and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rflfair.com

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RFL Fuar operates in the exhibition and trade fair services sector in Turkey, positioning itself as a leader with a history dating back to 2006. The business model focuses on service provision for trade events, including incentives consulting and multimedia galleries. The company targets business clients involved in foreign trade and industry sectors. The partnership with rfltd.net suggests an extended ecosystem supporting trade fair scheduling and information. The company appears small in size but established, with a consistent brand presence and moderate trust indicators. Revenue streams likely derive from event organization and related services. Growth potential exists through digital enhancements and expanded service offerings.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with significant gaps. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details, security headers, and privacy policies indicates limited security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The domain registration is stable and trustworthy, but the lack of DNSSEC and security best practices reduces resilience against attacks. Data collection is minimal, reducing exposure but also limiting user trust signals. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is not demonstrated. The company should prioritize implementing security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and privacy documentation to improve security culture and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS certificates and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RFL Fuar
Description
RFL Fuar is a company providing exhibition and fair services, focusing on connecting markets and offering quality services since 2006, primarily serving Turkish foreign trade and industry sectors.
Key services
Trade fair organization, Exhibition services, Consulting on incentives, Gallery services (photo and video), Country-specific trade information
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Swiper, Owl Carousel, Flexslider, Lightbox, WOW.js, FakeLoader, Isotope, EasyPieChart, ElevateZoom
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses multiple common JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and UX.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate business presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with Bootstrap and jQuery-based plugins for UI components and animations. Hosting is through Bluehost with domain registration by IHS Telekom, indicating a standard commercial hosting environment. Performance is moderate with no advanced CMS or backend frameworks detected. The site is mobile responsive but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of modern analytics or tracking tools, suggesting minimal data collection. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rflfair.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rflfair.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.