Skip to main content

Security report for requestmetrics.com

TrackJS LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Request Metrics, operated by TrackJS LLC, is a specialized SaaS provider focused on unified web performance monitoring combining automated Lighthouse lab testing and real user monitoring. The company targets web developers, SEO specialists, and digital marketers aiming to optimize Core Web Vitals and improve website speed to boost SEO and revenue. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Structured data and customer testimonials enhance trust and credibility. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript technologies, integrates advanced analytics and error monitoring tools such as PostHog and TrackJS, and maintains fast performance with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and GDPR compliance, though some security headers and a dedicated security policy page are absent. WHOIS data aligns well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and stable domain registration. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy, professional, and technically mature digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching requestmetrics.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
40
Email security
77
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Request Metrics occupies a niche in the web performance monitoring market, leveraging automated lab testing and real user data to provide actionable insights. Its SaaS business model is supported by tiered pricing and a focus on developer and marketing teams. The company maintains partnerships with related product lines such as TrackJS, RemoteJS, and CertKit, enhancing its ecosystem. Customer testimonials and aggregate 5-star ratings indicate positive market reception. The company is small-sized, founded in 2020, and based in the United States. Its marketing strategy includes content-rich resources, free tools, and community engagement through events and blogs. The presence of multiple social media channels and integration with HubSpot marketing tools reflects a mature digital marketing approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and GDPR compliance by avoiding cookies and IP storage. Use of TrackJS for error monitoring and PostHog for analytics with session recording indicates active monitoring of site health and user behavior. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could enhance DNS security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened by formalizing policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with contact details.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention policies and privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
TrackJS LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TrackJS LLC
Description
Unified Lighthouse Performance testing and Real User Monitoring. Optimize your Core Web Vitals, boost SEO, and drive more revenue with faster websites.
Key services
Lighthouse Performance Testing, Real User Monitoring, Core Web Vitals monitoring, Web Resource Performance analysis, SEO performance insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, PostHog analytics, TrackJS error monitoring, HubSpot marketing, Google Analytics, Lighthouse, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No cookies or IP storage for GDPR compliance
  • Ad block bypass mechanism
  • Use of security monitoring tools (TrackJS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog, TrackJS
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot
Tracking pixels
PostHog, TrackJS
Marketing tools
HubSpot, PostHog
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.
  2. Strong focus on web performance monitoring tools and services.
  3. Good use of modern analytics and error tracking technologies.
  4. Clear business and contact information provided.
  5. No signs of security blocking or content filtering.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected.
  7. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with integrations for analytics (Google Analytics, PostHog), error monitoring (TrackJS), and marketing automation (HubSpot). The site is fast loading, mobile optimized, and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting is managed via NameCheap DNS servers. The site uses JSON-LD for rich structured data including business, product, and review information, enhancing search engine visibility. Performance and accessibility are rated good to excellent. The technical infrastructure supports a professional SaaS offering with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with requestmetrics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review requestmetrics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.