Skip to main content

Security report for reglist24.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website start.reglist24.com represents a business focused on providing software solutions for event and marketing campaign management. The site is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme and related Kadence plugins, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. The content is professional and targeted towards businesses and event organizers seeking software tools to manage their marketing activities. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and age, which could impact trustworthiness. The site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Technically, the website shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced security headers and analytics integration. Overall, the security posture is weak due to missing security best practices and lack of transparency in domain registration.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reglist24.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to operate in the technology sector, specifically offering event and marketing software solutions. The business model likely involves software as a service or product sales to small or medium-sized enterprises and event organizers. The website content is well-structured and professionally designed, suggesting a focus on user experience and clear communication of services. However, the lack of contact details and legal policies may hinder customer confidence and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or certifications are evident, limiting insights into the company's market positioning or ecosystem. The absence of WHOIS data and domain age information suggests the domain may be newly registered or privacy-protected, which could be a risk factor for potential customers or partners.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL/TLS configuration details, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which limits the ability to assess readiness for security incidents. The lack of contact information further complicates reporting or communication of security issues. To improve security posture, the business should implement HTTPS, add security headers, establish clear privacy and cookie policies, and provide contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Software solution for managing events and marketing campaigns.
Key services
Event management software, Marketing campaign management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Kadence Theme, Kadence Blocks, Kadence Blocks Pro, Kadence Glightbox, Kadence SimpleLightbox, Kadence Video Popup
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Kadence Blocks, Kadence Blocks Pro
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain is not registered.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Website uses WordPress with Kadence theme and related plugins.
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking services detected.
  8. Content is professional and related to event and marketing software.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Kadence theme and multiple Kadence plugins, which provide advanced block editing and UI components. The site includes stylesheets and scripts for sliders, galleries, video popups, and lightboxes, indicating a rich interactive user interface. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO meta tags and structured CSS. However, there is no evidence of advanced performance optimization such as caching or CDN usage. The absence of analytics tools limits insights into user behavior and site performance. Technical debt appears low, but security and compliance gaps present risks to operational stability and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reglist24.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reglist24.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.