Skip to main content

Security report for regioner.dk

Danske regioner · Political organization · Australia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
4of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regioner.dk

This scan found 7 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danske Regioner holds a significant position as a governmental body coordinating regional healthcare and development in Denmark. Its business model is public sector focused, providing information and governance rather than commercial services. The website's content and structure reflect a well-established organization with a large audience including citizens and professionals. The presence of detailed economic and healthcare information indicates a comprehensive service offering. Partnerships with cookie consent providers and use of analytics tools like Siteimprove suggest a commitment to compliance and performance monitoring. The absence of commercial advertising and affiliate programs aligns with its public service mission. The organization's market presence is stable and authoritative within the Danish government sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and secure cookie handling via ASP.NET Core. The cookie consent banner is detailed and compliant with GDPR, including explicit consent mechanisms and third-party disclosures. However, some recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to enhance protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response information, which could improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional headers and explicit policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents or abuse reports.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure ongoing compliance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Danske Regioner
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danske Regioner
Description
Danske Regioner is the association of the five Danish regions. It focuses on healthcare, regional development, agreements and economy, and related public services. The website provides information about health services, regional development strategies, economic agreements, and organizational information about the Danish regions.
Key services
Healthcare information and coordination, Regional development strategies, Economic and agreement management, Public sector communication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Web Fonts, jQuery Modal, Modernizr, ASP.NET Core (implied by cookies), CookieInformation Consent Management
Frameworks
ASP.NET Core
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by ASP.NET Core cookies)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Siteimprove
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK, Siteimprove
Marketing tools
CookieInformation Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional governmental portal for Danish regions.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent with detailed categories and third-party processors.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No visible terms of service page detected.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Umbraco).
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with GDPR considerations.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policy found on the site.
  9. External links mostly to trusted domains and service providers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regioner.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regioner.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.