Skip to main content

Security report for macquarietelecom.com

Macquarie Telecom · Telecommunications · Australia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Macquarie Telecom is a prominent Australian telecommunications provider specializing in business communication solutions including cloud, data networking, voice, and cybersecurity services. The company targets enterprise and government sectors, positioning itself as a trusted partner with a strong focus on secure and reliable IT infrastructure. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supporting its market position with clear service offerings and contact channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery UI, providing a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though the absence of a published security policy and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. The lack of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that impacts domain trustworthiness, though the overall website and business credibility remain high. Strategic recommendations include publishing a formal security policy, adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and enhancing accessibility features to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching macquarietelecom.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
95
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention macquarietelecom.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
38
Employees
1
Customers
3
Third parties
34
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-05-20 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for macquarietelecom.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.macquarietelecom.com2026-05-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Macquarie Telecom operates in the telecommunications sector with a B2B business model focused on enterprise and government clients. Its competitive advantage lies in tailored communication solutions and a reputation for reliability and security. The company appears to have a subsidiary relationship with Macquarie Technology Group, indicating a broader technology ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include cloud services, data networking, voice solutions, and cybersecurity offerings. The website's professional design and comprehensive policies suggest a mature digital presence. Partnerships and integrations with technology providers are implied through linked domains and technology stack. Growth indicators include active social media presence and detailed service descriptions. The company maintains a clear contact infrastructure supporting sales, support, and general inquiries.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by formalizing security governance documentation and enhancing incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page detailing security governance and controls.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information for security-related issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Macquarie Telecom Group Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Macquarie Telecom
Description
Macquarie Telecom provides business communication solutions including cloud, data, voice, and cybersecurity services tailored for enterprises and government sectors.
Key services
Cloud services, Data networking, Voice services, Cybersecurity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery UI, Google Fonts, Elementor
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused and professional.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in the queried WHOIS server.
  4. Website uses modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress with Elementor).
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and forms.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Good SEO and mobile optimization observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, utilizing Bootstrap and jQuery UI frameworks for responsive design and UI components. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and assets are optimized with preload hints. The site shows moderate performance with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities inherent to WordPress and the need for continuous updates. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement advanced performance optimizations. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence aligned with business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with macquarietelecom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review macquarietelecom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.