Skip to main content

Security report for macquarie.com

Macquarie Group Limited · Finance · Australia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Macquarie Group Limited is a global financial services organization with Australian heritage, operating in 30 markets. The company provides diversified services including asset management, banking, advisory, and risk and capital solutions across multiple sectors such as energy, commodities, and infrastructure. The website reflects a mature business with a professional digital presence, targeting corporate clients, investors, and job seekers. The business model is focused on delivering comprehensive financial services globally with a strong market position. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile optimized, accessible, and SEO friendly, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Performance is moderate with good user experience and navigation clarity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses security headers, and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data and lack of explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts slightly reduce the overall security trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, representing a trustworthy financial institution. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit vulnerability disclosure policies, providing incident response contact details, and enhancing transparency around data protection officer contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching macquarie.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
79
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention macquarie.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,600
Employees
5
Customers
1,414
Third parties
181
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2026-05-17 · 32 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for macquarie.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –broker.macquarie.com2026-05-17
  • –broker.macquarie.com2025-07-24
  • –broker.macquarie.com2025-07-20
  • –broker.macquarie.com2025-07-09
  • –broker.macquarie.com2025-04-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Macquarie Group Limited holds a strong market position as a diversified financial services provider with a global footprint. Its competitive advantage lies in its broad sector expertise spanning renewables, infrastructure, technology, commodities, and energy. The business model leverages asset management, banking, advisory, and capital solutions to serve institutional and corporate clients. Revenue streams likely include asset management fees, banking services, and advisory commissions. The company targets sophisticated investors, corporate clients, and professionals seeking career opportunities. Growth indicators include extensive regional presence and diversified service offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes trusted login and recruitment platforms, enhancing operational efficiency and client engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive information or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response information represent compliance gaps. Data protection practices appear robust, but transparency could be improved by publishing security policies and contact channels for incident reporting. The security culture is implied to be strong given the corporate governance and risk management content, but explicit security communication to users is limited.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Enhance transparency by listing Data Protection Officer contact details prominently.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Maintain and display relevant security certifications and compliance badges to boost trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Macquarie Group Limited
Description
We are a diversified financial group providing clients with asset management and finance, banking, advisory and risk and capital solutions across debt, equity and commodities.
Key services
asset management, finance, banking, advisory, risk and capital solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Adobe Helix RUM, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  3. No visible security or privacy policy contact emails or phone numbers
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain registration trust verification
  5. No signs of adult or questionable content
  6. Multiple external trusted domains linked for recruitment and login portals
  7. Use of modern web technologies and consent management tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for consent management. The infrastructure supports responsive design and accessibility standards, ensuring good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, minimizing technical debt. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and transparency around security practices. No critical technical risks were identified that would impact business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with macquarie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review macquarie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.