Skip to main content

Security report for regional.cz

Michaela Mikovcová · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.regional.cz represents a small Czech web development business operated by Michaela Mikovcová, specializing in responsive web design, custom web applications, SEO optimization, and related hosting and email services. The business targets entrepreneurs, non-profits, small firms, and individuals seeking tailored web solutions. The site demonstrates a good level of technical maturity with a custom CMS, use of modern web technologies such as PHP, MySQL, jQuery, and integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. The website is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear navigation and professional content presentation. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and displays a cookie consent banner aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers are missing, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trust in domain legitimacy, although the website content and SSL presence suggest a legitimate business. Contact information is limited to a phone number, with no company email address visible. Overall, the website is well-structured and professional, with moderate security posture and good privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and domain registration clarity would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regional.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on web development services for a niche local market in the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantage lies in offering customized web solutions including responsive design, CMS development, SEO, and hosting services. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based web development contracts and ongoing hosting or maintenance services. The target customer segments include small businesses, entrepreneurs, non-profits, and personal website owners. The company appears to be a sole proprietorship or small entity without subsidiaries or parent companies. The partnership ecosystem is limited, with no explicit partner domains identified. Growth indicators are not evident from the website content. The business model is service-oriented with direct client engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and GDPR-aligned cookie consent mechanisms. The presence of an SSL certificate seal indicates attention to secure communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security.txt or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and jQuery requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No sensitive data exposure or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and enhanced transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Add a company contact email address prominently on the website to improve communication and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is publicly available to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Michaela Mikovcová
Description
Tvorba responzivních webových stránek, webových aplikací, eshopů, blogů, fotogalerií a dalších webových řešení na míru pro podnikání, neziskovky, živnostníky a firmy.
Key services
webové stránky, webové aplikace, redakční systém, responzivní design, hosting a emailové služby, SEO optimalizace, grafika a fotografie
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, MySQL, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • GDPR compliance
  • Privacy policy
  • SSL certificate seal displayed

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Strong focus on web development and related services.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanisms.
  5. No contact email found, only phone number provided.
  6. No visible forms collecting personal data on main page.
  7. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  8. SSL certificate and seal displayed, indicating HTTPS usage.
  9. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS built with PHP and MySQL, supported by client-side libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and marketing analytics. The site is hosted on a provider mentioned as activ24, supporting HTTP/2 and HTTPS with DV SSL certificates. Performance is moderate with image optimization using WebP format and responsive design ensuring good mobile experience. Accessibility considerations are present, including compliance with WCAG 2.1 standards. The site lacks modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms like WordPress or Drupal, indicating a bespoke development approach. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential outdated third-party scripts. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regional.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regional.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.