Skip to main content

Security report for regiokantine.de

IG Regionalbewegung Mittelfranken · Other · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Kantine sucht Region' operated by IG Regionalbewegung Mittelfranken serves as a regional platform to promote and facilitate the supply of regional food products to community catering services, particularly targeting canteen operators and regional producers in the Mittelfranken area of Germany. It provides an online directory for regional suppliers and encourages registration of producers and processors to strengthen local economic cycles. The platform positions itself as a niche regional service complementing other digital regional marketing initiatives. Technically, the website employs a simple but effective infrastructure using jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements, hosted on resellerinterface.de nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized with a clear navigation structure and good content quality, though it lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or complex frameworks are detected, indicating a lightweight custom or static site. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS as indicated by the base URL, but lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance. No forms with sensitive data are present on the homepage, reducing immediate risk exposure. The WHOIS data is minimal but not privacy protected, with no suspicious patterns detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. The overall risk assessment is low to moderate. The site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security headers, and clearer contact information to improve user trust and regulatory adherence. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regiokantine.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets a specialized regional market segment focused on sustainable and local food supply chains in community catering. Its competitive advantage lies in its regional focus and support from local government entities such as Bezirk Mittelfranken and European agricultural funds. The business model is based on providing a free registration and listing service for regional producers and processors, facilitating connections with canteen operators. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely supported by public funding and grants. The target customers are canteen operators and regional food suppliers in Mittelfranken. Growth potential depends on expanding the supplier base and increasing platform adoption among catering services. The partnership ecosystem includes regional government bodies and agricultural funds, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and security policies. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of cookie consent and security.txt files indicates gaps in GDPR and security best practices compliance. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security culture appears minimal but adequate for the site's scope. Improvements are needed to align with modern security standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IG Regionalbewegung Mittelfranken
Description
Die Website bietet eine Plattform zur Förderung regionaler Lebensmittel in Gemeinschaftsverpflegung, insbesondere für Kantinenbetreiber und regionale Anbieter in Mittelfranken. Ziel ist es, regionale Wirtschaftskreisläufe zu stärken und die Suche nach regionalen Lieferanten zu erleichtern.
Key services
Anbieterverzeichnis für regionale Lebensmittel, Plattform für Kantinenbetreiber zur Lieferantensuche, Registrierung für regionale Erzeuger und Verarbeiter
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by base href https://)
  • No visible forms with sensitive inputs on homepage

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on regional food supply chain and community catering in Mittelfranken, Germany.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  4. Privacy policy is present but cookie consent is missing.
  5. No terms of service or security policies published.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Technical stack is simple and uses jQuery and FontAwesome.
  8. No forms with sensitive data on homepage; registration likely on subpages.
  9. Hosting via resellerinterface.de nameservers.
  10. No social media links detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a lightweight technical stack primarily based on jQuery 3.5.1 and FontAwesome icons, with no detected CMS or complex frameworks. Hosting is via resellerinterface.de nameservers, indicating a reseller hosting environment. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility optimizations. Performance is moderate, with no heavy scripts or analytics detected. The absence of tracking and marketing tools suggests a privacy-conscious approach but also limits marketing insights. Technical debt appears low due to the simple architecture, but modernization opportunities include adopting modern JavaScript frameworks and improving SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regiokantine.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regiokantine.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.