Skip to main content

Security report for redcar.io

Redcar · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Redcar is a technology company specializing in AI-powered B2B sales agents designed to automate and scale sales outreach and lead qualification. Their flagship product, the F1 Agent, offers customizable AI-driven research, intent detection, and outreach capabilities tailored to diverse go-to-market strategies. Positioned as a flexible and accurate AI sales solution, Redcar has secured venture funding and demonstrates trustworthiness through SOC 2 Type 2 certification. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools to monitor user engagement and performance. Technically, Redcar leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and other marketing and tracking platforms. The site is hosted on Webflow, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. While the site is well-optimized for SEO and user experience, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers implementation. Privacy compliance is addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, though cookie consent mechanisms are absent. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and displays SOC 2 certification, indicating a commitment to data security and compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests opportunities to strengthen the security posture. The WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, which is typical for startups but limits external verification of domain ownership. Overall, Redcar presents a credible and professional online presence with strong business and technical foundations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and improving transparency around incident response to further build trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redcar.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Redcar operates in the competitive AI-driven sales automation market, targeting B2B sales teams, founders, leaders, and agencies. Their business model centers on SaaS delivery of AI agents that automate lead research, intent detection, and outreach, providing a scalable alternative to manual sales efforts. The company leverages venture capital backing and SOC 2 certification to differentiate itself as a trustworthy and compliant provider. Their ecosystem includes partnerships for career listings and certification validation. Growth indicators include active marketing, professional branding, and integration of advanced analytics. The company’s focus on customization and flexibility addresses diverse customer needs, positioning it well for market expansion.

Security posture

Redcar demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and SOC 2 Type 2 certification, signaling adherence to recognized security standards. The website does not expose sensitive data and integrates trusted third-party analytics responsibly. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by adopting additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate preparedness and build customer trust.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and meet broader compliance standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Redcar
Description
Redcar provides flexible AI sales agents that scale B2B sales by qualifying, researching, personalizing, and following up like top sales reps. Their F1 Agent automates go-to-market strategies and outreach with customization for different teams.
Key services
AI Sales Agent (F1 Agent), Account research and tagging, Intent detection via live job post signals, Custom AI agent use cases, Integrated outreach and deliverability tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Hotjar, Marker.io, RB2B tracking, Koala analytics
Frameworks
Webflow, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SOC 2 Type 2 certification badge displayed
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Marker.io, RB2B, Koala
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Marker.io, RB2B, Koala
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, indicating privacy protection
  4. Strong trust signals including SOC 2 certification and venture funding announcement
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts present
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  7. Contact information limited to email and external demo form
  8. No phone numbers or physical addresses publicly listed
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern web standards and integrating multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Marker.io, RB2B, and Koala. The hosting on Webflow ensures reliable uptime and moderate performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redcar.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redcar.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.