Skip to main content

Security report for reactandshare.com

React & Share · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

React & Share is a technology company offering a SaaS website feedback tool designed to help digital communications teams gather high volumes of quality user feedback to improve website content. The company positions itself as a trusted provider with over 3.6 million pages using its feedback buttons worldwide, emphasizing actionable insights and automated reporting. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and accessible, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site leverages Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager, hosted on a reputable CDN, ensuring moderate performance and good SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is good with a clear privacy policy and GDPR adherence, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and credible with clear contact information and social media presence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of reactandshare.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reactandshare.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

React & Share operates in the technology sector, targeting digital communications teams and website content managers with a SaaS feedback solution. Its competitive advantage lies in delivering significantly increased user feedback volumes and actionable insights, supported by automated reporting. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, with a focus on improving website content effectiveness. The company demonstrates growth and market presence through partnerships and endorsements, including NHS and other organizations. The website content and testimonials reinforce credibility and customer satisfaction. The partnership with askem.com indicates strategic brand evolution. Revenue streams likely include SaaS subscriptions and enterprise contracts. The company maintains a small size with a focused product offering and a clear value proposition.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but is common in SaaS websites. Overall, the security risks are low but could be mitigated further by implementing recommended headers and policies. Compliance with GDPR is indicated but could be enhanced with cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to improve security posture.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full privacy compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
React & Share
Description
High volume, high quality feedback directly from your customers. React & Share helps digital comms teams improve their websites and satisfy their customers.
Key services
Website feedback collection, Page-specific insights, Automated reporting, User feedback analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts (Montserrat), jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused and professional with clear calls to action.
  3. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and is hosted on a reputable CDN.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Twitter is linked.
  8. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Fonts and jQuery. It is hosted on Amazon CloudFront CDN, ensuring reliable delivery and moderate performance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, adhering to WCAG 2.1 AA standards. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of Google Tag Manager facilitates analytics and marketing but introduces moderate user tracking. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance performance by optimizing scripts and adding security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reactandshare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reactandshare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.