Skip to main content

Security report for rdm.com

Reichle & De-Massari AG · Telecommunications · Switzerland

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reichle & De-Massari AG (R&M) is a well-established Swiss company specializing in cabling and connectivity solutions for high-end communication networks, serving sectors such as Local Area Networks, Data Centers, and Public Networks. With over 60 years of experience and a mature domain registered since 1996, R&M holds a strong market position as a leading global provider. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, offering multilingual support, detailed product information, and interactive features like a virtual showroom. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and plugins, ensuring good SEO and user experience. However, a critical security gap exists due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, significantly impacting the site's security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, while the business credibility and content quality are strong, the security shortcomings require urgent attention to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rdm.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rdm.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

R&M operates primarily in the telecommunications sector, targeting enterprise customers needing robust network infrastructure solutions. Their business model is B2B, offering products, consulting, training, and digital tools. The company demonstrates a strong partnership ecosystem and maintains certifications such as EcoVadis Gold, indicating commitment to sustainability and quality. The website's multilingual and geotargeting features suggest a global reach. Marketing and analytics tools like HubSpot and Google Tag Manager are employed for lead generation and user insights. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage indicates a preference for controlled contact via forms, enhancing lead qualification.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic security posture with no known SSL/TLS vulnerabilities but critically lacks a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception risks. Security headers are minimal, and advanced protections like HSTS and OCSP stapling are not enabled. Forms include GDPR-compliant consent checkboxes and use Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, which could hinder timely security issue management. The site uses reputable plugins and frameworks but should enhance its security configuration to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checks and reduce latency.
  4. Add a publicly accessible security.txt file and establish a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Review and enhance security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and cookie flags (Secure, HttpOnly).

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Reichle & De-Massari AG
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using modern technologies such as Bootstrap 5, Slick Carousel, and multiple plugins for SEO, multilingual support, forms, and social sharing. Hosting is managed via Azure DNS, indicating enterprise-grade infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features, though these could be improved. Performance data is unavailable, but the use of CDN fonts and preloading suggests optimization efforts. The technical stack supports a rich user experience with interactive elements like virtual showrooms and event calendars. However, the lack of HTTPS is a significant technical risk that undermines overall infrastructure security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rdm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rdm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.