Skip to main content

Security report for rdm.com

Reichle & De-Massari AG · Telecommunications · Switzerland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reichle & De-Massari AG (R&M) is a well-established global provider specializing in cabling and connectivity solutions for high-end communication networks since 1964. Their website reflects a professional B2B business model targeting industries such as Local Area Networks, Data Centers, and Public Networks. The company positions itself as a leader in telecommunications infrastructure solutions with a broad international reach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital presence. The site includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms via Cookiebot, demonstrating attention to privacy regulations. Security-wise, while HTTPS is implied and cookie consent is managed, the absence of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data suggest areas for improvement in security posture and domain transparency. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and clearer domain registration information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rdm.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

R&M operates in the telecommunications sector with a focus on providing cabling and connectivity solutions to enterprise and industrial clients. Their market position as a leading global provider is supported by a long history dating back to 1964. The business model is primarily B2B, serving sectors requiring robust communication infrastructure. The website's content and structure support this positioning, targeting technical decision-makers and network professionals. The use of advanced marketing tools and multilingual support indicates a global customer base and a strategic approach to market penetration. However, the lack of explicit contact details and WHOIS transparency may limit direct customer engagement and trust in some regions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, reflecting compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security effectiveness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces typical privacy and security considerations but appears managed through consent. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency, which could impact trust. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available on the site, suggesting an opportunity to improve security communication and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve transparency and trustworthiness, ensuring WHOIS data is accurate and accessible.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear security policies and incident response contacts to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic audits to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Reichle & De-Massari AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reichle & De-Massari AG
Description
R&M (Reichle & De-Massari AG) is a leading Global cabling and connectivity solution provider for high end-communication networks since 1964. We serve a wide range of industries in the sectors of Local Area Networks, Data Centers and Public Networks.
Key services
Cabling solutions, Connectivity solutions, Local Area Networks, Data Centers, Public Networks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.6.14, Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel, Yoast SEO, Cookiebot, HubSpot forms
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on telecommunications cabling solutions.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance efforts.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness score.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
  6. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot and Hotjar.
  7. No evidence of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates several third-party services including HubSpot for marketing automation, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site uses modern fonts and iconography via FontAwesome and employs slick carousel for interactive content display. Performance appears moderate with preloading of fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The lack of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to strengthen the overall infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 28/100High28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rdm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rdm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.