Skip to main content

Security report for randstad.nl

Randstad · Other · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Randstad is a leading staffing agency in the Netherlands, providing a platform for job seekers to find vacancies and employment opportunities. The website is professionally designed, targeting a broad audience seeking employment. It leverages modern technologies including Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and reCaptcha to enhance user experience and security. The site is built on the Hippo CMS platform, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for Randstad's staffing services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching randstad.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Randstad operates in the staffing and recruitment sector, focusing on the Dutch market. Its business model revolves around connecting job seekers with employers via an online platform. The company maintains a strong market position as a well-known brand in the Netherlands. The website content and metadata emphasize job vacancies and recruitment services, targeting a general audience. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests an active approach to user engagement and conversion optimization. No direct contact emails or phone numbers were found, indicating reliance on web forms for communication. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was detected in the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented. Use of reCaptcha helps mitigate automated abuse. However, there is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The presence of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from more explicit disclosures and dedicated security contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels.
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for support and security incidents.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Randstad
Description
Randstad is a staffing agency providing job listings and vacancies for a broad audience in the Netherlands.
Key services
Job listings, Vacancies, Recruitment services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Decibel Insight, ReCaptcha, Medallia, JavaScript, CSS, SVG icons
Frameworks
Hippo CMS (Bloomreach)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCaptcha
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Decibel Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Decibel Insight
Marketing tools
Medallia
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism present.
  3. No explicit terms of service found.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the HTML.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  7. No direct security incident contact emails found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Hippo CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCaptcha. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing purposes. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses SVG icons and custom CSS for branding consistency. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence but should maintain vigilance on third-party dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with randstad.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review randstad.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.