Skip to main content

Security report for rafflepress.com

SeedProd LLC · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RafflePress, operated by SeedProd LLC, is a well-established WordPress plugin provider specializing in giveaway and contest solutions designed to grow email lists, website traffic, and social media followers. The company has positioned itself as a market leader in the WordPress giveaway plugin niche, offering a drag-and-drop builder, viral sharing features, and extensive marketing integrations. Their business model is primarily SaaS-based, selling licenses for their WordPress plugin and leveraging affiliate marketing to expand reach. The website content is professional, well-structured, and optimized for SEO, targeting business owners, marketers, and agencies seeking to enhance their digital marketing efforts through viral giveaways.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of rafflepress.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rafflepress.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rafflepress.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
79
Employees
0
Customers
79
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
37%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rafflepress.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company demonstrates strong market positioning with a medium-sized operation founded in 2014. Their competitive advantage lies in ease of use, verified social media engagement features, and seamless integration with popular email marketing platforms. Revenue streams include direct plugin sales and affiliate commissions. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized platforms such as WPBeginner, enhancing credibility. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides comprehensive resources and testimonials to support customer trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare DNS, enhancing security and performance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The site uses modern analytics and marketing tools responsibly but lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a privacy compliance gap.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Implement and display a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate commitment to security and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use and maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SeedProd LLC
Description
RafflePress is the best WordPress contest and giveaway plugin. Grow your email list, followers, and website traffic with viral giveaways in WordPress.
Key services
WordPress giveaway plugin, Giveaway campaign builder, Viral sharing and referral marketing, Email marketing integrations, Social media integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Cloudflare DNS, Vimeo API, YouTube API, SeedProd plugin, Heroic Blocks plugin, OptinMonster, Drip marketing, ThirstyAffiliates
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Drip, OptinMonster
Marketing tools
Drip, OptinMonster, MonsterInsights, ThirstyAffiliates
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress plugin vendor focused on giveaways and contests
  2. Strong SEO and marketing integration
  3. No exposed security issues or suspicious content
  4. Good use of modern marketing and analytics tools
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  6. Contact available via contact form
  7. No explicit cookie consent banner detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, and various marketing and affiliate tools. Performance is optimized with Cloudflare DNS and asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with excellent SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers would further modernize the infrastructure. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics services requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate privacy and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 73/100 +4Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 69/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rafflepress.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rafflepress.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.