Skip to main content

Security report for radissonblu.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

64/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.radissonhotels.com/en-us/brand/radisson-blu is currently inaccessible due to an access denial error, likely caused by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or other security mechanism. This prevents retrieval of any meaningful content, metadata, or business information. The WHOIS query for the domain also failed, returning no registration data, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy or privacy protection. Due to these access restrictions, no technical, security, or compliance details can be accurately assessed. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data and website content significantly limits the ability to evaluate the company's digital maturity or security posture. From a business perspective, no information about the company, its services, or contact details could be extracted. Technically, no technologies, frameworks, or hosting details are identifiable. Security analysis is not feasible without access to headers or site content. Overall, the site currently presents a high risk due to lack of transparency and accessibility. Strategic recommendations include resolving the access denial to enable proper website analysis, ensuring WHOIS data is publicly available and accurate, implementing and publishing privacy and security policies, and providing clear contact and incident response information. These steps will improve trust, compliance, and security posture visibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of radissonblu.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radissonblu.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention radissonblu.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,560
Employees
0
Customers
2,607
Third parties
953
Weak passwords
10%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for radissonblu.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the access denial and lack of WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be associated with Radisson Hotels, a known hospitality brand, but no direct confirmation or business details are accessible. No insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships can be confirmed. The absence of accessible content and metadata prevents analysis of target customer segments or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the blocked content and missing WHOIS data. The presence of an access denied page suggests a WAF or security control is active, which is a positive security measure. However, the inability to access security headers, SSL configuration, or policy documents limits evaluation. No vulnerabilities or compliance gaps can be identified. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are unknown.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the access denial issue to allow full website content access for analysis and user interaction.
  2. Ensure WHOIS domain registration data is complete, accurate, and publicly accessible to improve transparency.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to demonstrate compliance and build trust.
  4. Implement visible contact and incident response information to support security and customer service.
  5. Regularly audit security headers, SSL configuration, and vulnerability management to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Access Denied page detected with reference to errors.edgesuite.net, indicating a WAF or security mechanism blocking access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is completely blocked by a security mechanism or WAF.
  2. No metadata, structured data, or meaningful content is accessible.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  4. No contact, policy, or business information is extractable.
  5. External domain errors.edgesuite.net is referenced, likely related to CDN or WAF error handling.
  6. No scripts or technologies can be identified due to minimal HTML content.
  7. Security headers and SSL configuration cannot be assessed.
  8. Overall analysis is severely limited by access restrictions.
Technical notes

Notes

No technical details can be extracted from the provided HTML content due to the access denial. No scripts, meta tags, structured data, or technology indicators are present. The site references an external error domain (errors.edgesuite.net), suggesting use of a CDN or WAF service. Without access, performance, mobile optimization, SEO, and accessibility cannot be evaluated. The domain's technical infrastructure and hosting provider remain unknown.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 64/100Medium18 findings · partial scanView report
  2. 75/100Medium4 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radissonblu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radissonblu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.