Skip to main content

Security report for quincaillere.org

Louise DIDIER · Other · France

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Louise Quincaillère is a small, specialized service provider focused on cooperative and collaborative facilitation, offering training and digital tools to community groups and collectives. The website presents a clear business model centered on education, training, and support for cooperative projects, with a niche market position in the cooperative ecosystem in France. Technically, the site is built on the YesWiki CMS platform, leveraging Bootstrap and FontAwesome for UI, hosted by OVH sas. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and accessible at a basic level. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended improvements. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quincaillere.org

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the cooperative and community facilitation sector, targeting collectives and activists interested in cooperation and commons. It leverages partnerships with training organizations such as Animacoop and YesWiki, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on training, facilitation tools, and digital support for cooperative projects. The presence of a LinkedIn profile and professional contact details supports credibility. The domain age and registration details align with the business history, indicating stability. No advertising or monetization mechanisms are evident, suggesting a mission-driven or non-commercial approach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain status protections (clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited), which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, representing potential security gaps. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent, or incident response information, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, reducing privacy risks. The site uses standard, well-known technologies without detected vulnerable libraries. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing DNSSEC, security headers, and formal privacy and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect users.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add an incident response or security contact channel to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to monitor site usage and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Louise DIDIER
Description
Accompaniment through three action levers: animation tools for collectives, digital tools for remote collaboration, and political tools to mature cooperation and work on commons and power issues. Offers training such as Animacoop and YesWiki, supports collaborative projects and wikis, and builds bridges between resource sites to make commons on cooperation more accessible.
Key services
Training Animacoop, Training YesWiki, Support for collaborative wiki projects, Facilitation tools for collective organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.5.4, FontAwesome, jQuery, YesWiki CMS, Custom JavaScript modules
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
YesWiki
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with professional email and phone.
  4. Site uses YesWiki CMS with Bootstrap and FontAwesome for UI.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Content is focused on cooperative tools and training, targeting community groups.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn link.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on YesWiki CMS, a specialized wiki platform, combined with Bootstrap 4.5.4 and FontAwesome for styling and icons. It uses jQuery and custom JavaScript modules for interactivity. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. The site is mobile-optimized and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata beyond basic Open Graph tags and meta viewport. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA landmarks and skip links present. There is no evidence of modern analytics or marketing tools. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quincaillere.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quincaillere.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.