Skip to main content

Security report for qualified.com

Qualified.com, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qualified.com, Inc. operates a sophisticated AI-driven inbound pipeline generation platform centered around Piper, the AI SDR agent. The company targets B2B marketers and sales teams, offering a SaaS solution that automates lead engagement, personalized conversations, email follow-ups, meeting scheduling, and content personalization. Positioned as a market leader with numerous five-star reviews and recognition from G2 and Salesforce AppExchange, Qualified.com demonstrates strong market presence and customer trust. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Cloudflare hosting, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Wistia. However, the security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, which poses significant risks. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of qualified.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qualified.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Qualified.com is positioned as a leading AI marketing technology provider specializing in AI SDR agents and conversational marketing. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on automating inbound sales and marketing workflows at scale. The company serves medium-sized to large enterprises in the technology sector, with a strong emphasis on pipeline generation and sales efficiency. Their ecosystem includes integrations with Salesforce, Marketo, HubSpot, and other marketing platforms. The presence of multiple customer case studies and high-profile endorsements indicates a mature and growing customer base. The company invests in content marketing and education through Qualified University and maintains active social media channels. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate but with critical gaps. DNS records show proper SPF and DMARC configurations, reducing email spoofing risks. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, and no TLS protocols are enabled, resulting in unencrypted HTTP traffic. The absence of HSTS and OCSP stapling further weakens transport security. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs are published on the site. Forms are embedded via Qualified scripts but no explicit security controls or input sanitization details are visible. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception and man-in-the-middle attacks, which could undermine user trust and compliance with data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site immediately.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols to protect data in transit.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with the preload directive to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  6. Conduct a security audit of embedded forms and scripts to ensure secure data handling and input validation.
  7. Regularly monitor and update DNS security settings and consider enabling DNSSEC for additional protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure, leveraging Cloudfront for some script delivery. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and integrates with marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Wistia for video content. The site includes multiple embedded Qualified forms for lead capture and uses advanced UI components like Splide carousels and GSAP animations. Performance is suboptimal with a load time of approximately 17.5 seconds and a large page size (~2.5MB), indicating potential optimization opportunities. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is modern but requires performance tuning and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100 −1Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 70/100 +1Medium29 findingsView report
  3. 69/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qualified.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qualified.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.