Skip to main content

Security report for qodeinteractive.com

Qode Interactive · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Qode Interactive is a well-established company specializing in premium WordPress themes and plugins, founded in 2011. Their website presents a professional portfolio of products targeting WordPress users, designers, and agencies seeking high-quality themes with extensive customization options. The company maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple social media platforms and uses modern web technologies including WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution. The technical infrastructure is solid, leveraging HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, security policies, and incident response contacts, which are important for comprehensive compliance and trust. No security headers were detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were found in the WHOIS data, which aligns well with the company's legitimacy and domain age. Overall, the website demonstrates good content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility, but could enhance its privacy compliance and security posture by publishing relevant policies and improving security headers. The risk level is moderate with no critical issues detected, making it a trustworthy site for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching qodeinteractive.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Qode Interactive operates in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress theme and plugin development and sales. Their business model revolves around premium digital product offerings with a target audience of web professionals and agencies. The company has a medium-sized presence with a history dating back over a decade, indicating market stability. Their competitive advantage lies in a diverse portfolio of well-categorized themes and active social media engagement. Revenue streams likely include direct sales and affiliate marketing, supported by the Affiliate WP plugin. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on digital sales channels rather than direct customer support. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data. The company could benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies to strengthen customer trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits the ability for external security researchers to report issues responsibly. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security matters. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a commercial WordPress site but requires improvements to meet higher compliance standards and reduce potential risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contacts such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Add standard security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure page or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Qode Interactive
Description
Build a perfect website with premium WordPress themes designed by Qode Interactive. Discover amazing designs with a wide variety of features and customization options.
Key services
Premium WordPress themes, WordPress plugins, Theme customization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Stripe JS, Easy Digital Downloads, Affiliate WP, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via a GDPR plugin.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  4. Multiple WordPress themes and plugins offered with detailed categorization.
  5. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress plugins.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. No security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Stripe JS, and several WordPress plugins such as Easy Digital Downloads and Affiliate WP. The use of WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution indicates reliance on popular page builder and slider frameworks. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, suggesting CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced by updating or auditing plugins and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with qodeinteractive.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review qodeinteractive.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.