Skip to main content

Security report for pyro.host

Spaceship, Inc. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pyro.host is a VPS hosting provider operated by Spaceship, Inc., established in 2023. The company offers high-performance virtual private servers with instant deployment capabilities, modern AMD Ryzen processors, and robust DDoS protection. Their platform targets developers, teams, and creators seeking scalable and reliable infrastructure solutions. The website demonstrates a professional design with good mobile optimization and clear navigation, leveraging modern web technologies such as Next.js and React. Analytics integration includes TikTok, Google Tag Manager, and PostHog, indicating a moderate level of user tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though improvements are needed in explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Overall, Pyro.host presents a credible and technically mature VPS service with room for enhanced transparency and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pyro.host

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pyro.host positions itself as a modern VPS provider focusing on performance and ease of use. Their business model revolves around scalable VPS plans with clear pricing tiers and instant deployment features. The company targets a tech-savvy audience including developers and teams, emphasizing cutting-edge hardware and developer-friendly tools. The domain registration aligns with the business identity, and the use of Cloudflare DNS suggests a focus on reliability and security. While the website lacks explicit privacy and security policies, the product offerings and infrastructure indicate a growing cloud hosting provider with potential for market expansion. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, providing a baseline of security. Domain transfer prohibitions add protection against unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, limiting transparency for security researchers. No contact information for incident response or data protection officers is provided, which may hinder timely communication in case of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by adopting best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  3. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spaceship, Inc.
Description
Host your infrastructure on Pyro, delivering unparalleled cutting-edge hardware and effortless deployments at your fingertips.
Key services
Virtual Private Servers (VPS), Instant deployments, High-performance hardware, DDoS protection, Multiple OS options, Scalable infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cloudflare DNS, TikTok Analytics, Google Tag Manager, PostHog Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain transfer prohibitions set
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS for protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
TikTok Analytics, Google Tag Manager, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, PostHog
Marketing tools
TikTok Analytics, PostHog Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers VPS hosting with modern hardware and instant deployment features.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the analyzed page.
  3. Use of multiple analytics and tracking scripts including TikTok and PostHog.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. Domain is registered to Spaceship, Inc. with no privacy protection and transfer prohibitions enabled.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. Website is well designed, mobile optimized, and fast loading.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, contributing to reliability and security. The site integrates multiple analytics platforms, which may impact privacy compliance. The design is professional with clear content structure and SEO-friendly metadata. However, the lack of a CMS suggests custom development, which may require ongoing maintenance. Performance is fast with optimized assets and lazy loading. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with additional ARIA attributes and semantic markup. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and scalable VPS hosting platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pyro.host. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pyro.host.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.