Skip to main content

Security report for pushon.co.uk

PushON Ltd · E-commerce · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PushON Ltd is a well-established, award-winning full-service eCommerce agency operating primarily in the United Kingdom with offices in Manchester, Bristol, and Edinburgh. The company specializes in Magento web design, SEO, PPC, and eCommerce strategy services, targeting businesses seeking to enhance their online retail presence. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by comprehensive legal policies and active social media engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers present, although explicit security policy and incident response information are not published. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-optimized for SEO, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pushon.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pushon.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pushon.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PushON operates in the competitive eCommerce agency sector, leveraging its expertise in Magento and digital marketing to serve medium-sized clients primarily in the UK market. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored eCommerce solutions and marketing strategies. The company benefits from a strong market position as an award-winning agency with a clear value proposition. Its digital presence is supported by multiple marketing and tracking technologies, enabling data-driven decision-making and client reporting. The absence of publicly listed subsidiaries or parent companies suggests an independent operation. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with its audience and enhance brand visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. However, there is no publicly available security policy or incident response plan, which could be improved to enhance transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts and tracking pixels introduces potential risk vectors, necessitating regular security audits. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site complies with GDPR through clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced documentation and vulnerability disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or process to improve trust and readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
PushON Ltd
VAT number
GB901121688
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PushON Ltd
Description
PushON is an award-winning, full-service eCommerce agency in Manchester, Bristol and Edinburgh. Specialising in Magento web design, SEO, PPC and strategy.
Key services
Magento web design, SEO, PPC, eCommerce strategy
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Yoast SEO, Jetpack, Divi Theme, WordPress
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Jetpack
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and consistent branding with clear business focus.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond standard legal pages.
  6. WHOIS query was incorrectly performed on subdomain, resulting in no data.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Good SEO and technical implementation with modern CMS and theme.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging a modern and widely supported CMS platform. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is optimized for SEO with Yoast SEO plugin and includes comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The presence of multiple preconnect and preload directives indicates attention to performance optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and aligned with industry best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pushon.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pushon.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.