Skip to main content

Security report for purefindresults.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

purefindresults.com is a web search portal offering users a search interface with autocomplete suggestions and search result redirection. The site appears to be a small-scale technology service focused on providing search capabilities. The business model is centered around web search services, targeting a general audience. The website is basic in design and functionality, with moderate branding consistency and limited trust indicators such as a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates third-party consent management and tracking scripts. Hosting and DNS are managed via PublicDomainRegistry.com and ztomy.com nameservers, with no DNSSEC enabled.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching purefindresults.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company behind purefindresults.com is not clearly identified on the website, and no detailed business information or certifications are provided. The privacy policy is hosted on a different domain (skenzo.com), which may indicate a relationship or outsourcing of privacy management. The site lacks terms of service and direct contact emails or phone numbers, relying solely on a contact form. The market position and competitive advantages are unclear due to limited information. The business appears to be in an early stage or minimal operation, with a focus on basic search services and user tracking for analytics and advertising purposes.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers, and use of an outdated jQuery version present potential vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications are found. The WHOIS data shows a suspicious future creation date and lacks registrant details, reducing trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing modern security headers, updating libraries, enabling DNSSEC, and providing clearer security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear terms of service and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration data to reflect accurate creation dates and registrant information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A web search portal providing a search interface with autocomplete suggestions and search results redirection.
Key services
Web search, Autocomplete suggestions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, ConsentManager.net CMP, Akamai CDN, JavaScript ES5/ES6
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Clarity (Microsoft Clarity), Custom event tracking via kafkaLogPixelLib
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
kafkaLogPixelLib, clarityEventTrkr
Marketing tools
ConsentManager.net, Akamai CDN
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic web search portal with autocomplete functionality.
  2. Privacy policy is hosted on a different domain (skenzo.com), which may reduce trust.
  3. No terms of service found.
  4. Contact information only via a contact form; no emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Consent management implemented via ConsentManager.net scripts.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  7. No certifications or DPO info found.
  8. Technical stack is basic and somewhat outdated (jQuery 1.11.3).
  9. No CMS detected; likely custom built.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic web technologies including jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates third-party consent management and tracking scripts from ConsentManager.net and Microsoft Clarity. Hosting is via PublicDomainRegistry.com with DNS managed by ztomy.com nameservers. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or minimalistic build. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features but includes basic meta tags and responsive design elements. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and missing security enhancements, presenting opportunities for modernization and improved resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with purefindresults.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review purefindresults.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.