Skip to main content

Security report for pub-me.com

Pub-Me · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pub-Me is a small technology company based in the Czech Republic offering a modular content management system (CMS) named Pub-Me CMS, along with related web services such as project management, consulting, and custom module development. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and content focused on presenting their CMS product and services. Technically, the site uses jQuery, Lightbox, and Google Analytics, but lacks modern security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content itself appears professional and business-oriented. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pub-me.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
95
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pub-Me operates in a niche CMS market, targeting businesses and individuals seeking a customizable and modular CMS solution. Their business model combines software licensing with consulting and custom development services. The company emphasizes personalized service and offers demo access to prospective clients, which is a positive trust indicator. The lack of visible contact phone numbers and limited contact information may hinder customer engagement. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand and content quality, but the unclear domain registration status could affect credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries, and marketing efforts rely on basic analytics and direct website content.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture with no detected security headers and no visible incident response or security policy information. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The site uses Google Analytics, which involves user tracking but lacks clear privacy disclosures or cookie consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate attack surface, but the absence of security best practices such as CSP or HSTS headers is a concern. The missing WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Verify and secure domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trust.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including phone numbers and dedicated security/abuse contacts.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pub-Me
Description
Pub-Me offers a modular content management system (CMS) designed for complete website management, focusing on ease of use and technical/ content separation. They provide CMS software, project management, consulting, custom module development, and related web services.
Key services
Content Management System (Pub-Me CMS), Project management, Consultations and analyses, Custom module development, Web design and graphics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Lightbox, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. Content is in Czech with English language option available.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  4. Contact email found only in meta author tag; no visible contact forms or phone numbers.
  5. Website uses Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  8. Website focuses on a modular CMS product with additional web services.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No forms detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS (Pub-Me CMS) using jQuery and Lightbox libraries, with Google Analytics integrated for tracking. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for description, keywords, and author. However, there is no evidence of modern frameworks or platforms such as React or Angular. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but could be improved. The site lacks security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement details, which are critical for modern web security. No forms or interactive input fields were detected, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pub-me.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pub-me.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.