Skip to main content

Security report for ptr.vc

Dangling Pointers · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dangling Pointers is a small Europe-based technology company specializing in AI-powered product development. Their website presents a professional image focused on delivering AI-driven web applications, infrastructure solutions, electronics, UX/UI design, and product management services. The company targets businesses seeking innovative digital solutions to disrupt their industries. The website content is clear and well-structured, though it lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies with moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications. Security posture is limited with no detected security headers or incident response information, and privacy compliance is minimal due to missing policies. Overall, the site is professional but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ptr.vc

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a cutting-edge AI technology provider in the European market, focusing on AI product innovation and digital transformation. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end AI-powered solutions including web apps, cloud infrastructure, IoT electronics, UX/UI design, and product management. The absence of detailed company registration or physical address information suggests a small or startup operation. No social media or partner domains are linked, indicating a focused but limited digital footprint. The company likely generates revenue through project-based contracts or SaaS products. Growth indicators and partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture with HTTPS assumed but no explicit security headers detected. There is no published privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The lack of tracking or analytics scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy publication, header implementation, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured with strong SSL/TLS settings and display security indicators.
  4. Add incident response contact information and establish a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to improve business insights while maintaining compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dangling Pointers
Description
A Europe-based AI-products company specializing in designing and developing AI-powered products to innovate, streamline and power up digital solutions.
Key services
Web Apps, Infrastructure, Electronics, UX/UI, Product Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, SVG
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  2. Contact information limited to a single company email address.
  3. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website is well designed with clear navigation and professional content.
  7. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  9. No advertising or marketing tracking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with clean HTML5 and CSS3, including SVG graphics for logos and icons. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks. Performance appears moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with meta description and Open Graph tags but no structured data or JSON-LD. No external analytics or tracking scripts are detected, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing capabilities. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but basic, with opportunities for modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ptr.vc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ptr.vc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.