Skip to main content

Security report for provesrc.com

ProveSource · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProveSource is a technology company specializing in providing social proof tools designed to boost sales and conversions for e-commerce businesses. Their platform offers real-time sales pop-ups, live visitor counters, and customer review displays, with easy integration on popular platforms such as Shopify and WordPress. The company positions itself as a leading SaaS provider in the social proof market, targeting online retailers and website owners seeking to increase trust and sales performance. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with a moderate level of digital maturity demonstrated by the use of multiple analytics and marketing tools.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of provesrc.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching provesrc.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention provesrc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,290
Employees
1
Customers
1,285
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2025-07-30 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for provesrc.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –console.provesrc.com2025-07-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProveSource operates in the competitive social proof SaaS market, leveraging integrations with major e-commerce platforms to attract small to medium-sized online businesses. Their business model is subscription-based, focusing on conversion optimization services. The company maintains an active social media presence across Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube, which supports brand awareness and customer engagement. The domain age and registration details align well with the business claims, indicating a stable and legitimate operation. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies and contact information on the homepage may impact trust and compliance perceptions.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and related EPP statuses, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggest room for improvement in hardening the site against common web threats. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, which could affect the company's readiness to handle security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced technical controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear contact information including support and security incident contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProveSource
Description
ProveSource is the ultimate social proof tool to skyrocket conversions. Show real-time sales pop-ups, live visitor counters, and customer reviews to build trust and boost sales instantly. Easy 2-min setup on Shopify, WordPress & more.
Key services
Real-time sales pop-ups, Live visitor counters, Customer reviews display, Easy integration with Shopify, WordPress, and other platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, PostHog, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Elementor (WordPress page builder), PowerPack Elements, Swiper.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, PostHog
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, PostHog
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS provider for social proof tools targeting e-commerce platforms.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts without visible consent mechanisms.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and several marketing and analytics integrations.
  6. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business operations.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. No visible forms or contact forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, supplemented by several third-party plugins and libraries including PowerPack Elements and Swiper.js for UI components. The hosting infrastructure appears to be on Amazon AWS, as indicated by the DNS servers. The site loads multiple asynchronous JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing, including Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, and PostHog, indicating a mature approach to user behavior tracking and marketing optimization. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by the Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format, improving search engine visibility. Technical risks include potential privacy compliance gaps and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with provesrc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review provesrc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.