Skip to main content

Security report for provesrc.com

ProveSource · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ProveSource operates as a SaaS provider specializing in social proof and live sales notification tools designed to boost online sales conversions. The company positions itself as a market leader in this niche, targeting e-commerce businesses and online marketers. The website reflects a modern WordPress-based infrastructure with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, supported by AWS hosting inferred from DNS servers. The technical setup includes multiple analytics and marketing scripts such as Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap for GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching provesrc.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention provesrc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,290
Employees
1
Customers
1,285
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2025-07-30 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for provesrc.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –console.provesrc.com2025-07-30

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ProveSource's business model is SaaS, monetizing through subscription or usage of its social proof notification tools. The company targets online businesses seeking to increase trust and conversions via real-time social proof. Its competitive advantage lies in real-time notifications and FOMO pop-ups, which are proven conversion drivers. The company maintains active social media channels and uses advanced analytics tools, suggesting a data-driven growth approach. The domain age and registration details support a stable business presence since 2018. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The lack of explicit contact information on the homepage may limit direct customer engagement but is common in SaaS marketing sites focusing on sign-ups.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. However, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No security policy or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities are detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve browser security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProveSource
Description
ProveSource is the top social proof software that displays real-time sales activity, sign-ups, and reviews to build trust and drive conversions. Instantly boost credibility with live-sales notifications and FOMO pop-ups.
Key services
Real-time sales activity notifications, Sign-up notifications, Review notifications, FOMO pop-ups
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, PostHog
Frameworks
Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mixpanel, Google Analytics, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Mixpanel, PostHog
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are loaded asynchronously.
  4. Social media presence is confirmed via JSON-LD structured data.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and Elementor page builder.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No data protection officer contact or incident response contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, indicating a widely adopted CMS and SEO framework. Hosting is likely on AWS given the DNS servers. The site loads multiple asynchronous JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing, including Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and PostHog, reflecting a sophisticated marketing stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. The site would benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance to improve user experience and inclusivity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with provesrc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review provesrc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.