Skip to main content

Security report for projekt2k.de

Tino Dietel · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Projekt2k is a small technology-focused blog operated by Tino Dietel in Germany, providing content primarily in German with English language support. The website leverages WordPress CMS and employs modern privacy tools such as a Real Cookie Banner plugin and self-hosted Matomo analytics to ensure GDPR compliance and user privacy. The site targets technology enthusiasts and professionals, offering insightful articles and maintaining a professional and consistent brand presence. Technically, the site is hosted on basehosts.de with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response documentation. Overall, the domain registration details align well with the website content, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching projekt2k.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Projekt2k operates as a niche technology blog with a content publishing business model. The site benefits from a focused target audience of tech enthusiasts and professionals, leveraging self-hosted analytics to maintain privacy and compliance. The business appears small in scale, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The presence of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, along with contact information, supports credibility. The lack of terms of service and security policy pages suggests an opportunity to enhance transparency and trust. The website's partnership ecosystem is minimal, focusing on self-hosted services and trusted providers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR requirements. The use of self-hosted Matomo analytics reduces reliance on third-party trackers, enhancing privacy. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for strengthening defenses against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Incident response readiness and security policy documentation are lacking, which could impact the site's ability to respond effectively to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Create and publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tino Dietel
Description
Projekt2k is a blog and technology-focused website operated by Tino Dietel, providing content primarily in German and English. The site targets tech enthusiasts and professionals interested in technology topics and insights.
Key services
technology blog articles, privacy and cookie management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, Matomo Analytics, Real Cookie Banner plugin, jQuery, Superfish, ScrollReveal, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Self-hosted analytics to avoid third-party data sharing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins for privacy and cookie management.
  2. Self-hosted Matomo analytics enhances privacy compliance.
  3. Clear privacy and cookie policies in German with English alternate language available.
  4. Contact information includes physical address and contact form; email is base64 encoded but decodes to tino.dietel@projekt2k.de.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. No phone number explicitly labeled as company contact found.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided HTML content.
  9. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing PHP and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Superfish, and ScrollReveal for UI enhancements. It employs the Real Cookie Banner plugin for GDPR-compliant cookie management and self-hosted Matomo for analytics, indicating a privacy-conscious technical stack. Hosting is provided by basehosts.de with DNS servers ns1.basehosts.de and ns2.basehosts.de. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and multilingual support (German and English). The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with projekt2k.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review projekt2k.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.