Skip to main content

Security report for privacyshield.ai

PrivacyShield · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PrivacyShield is a recently founded (2023) technology company specializing in AI-powered privacy management solutions. Their platform automates critical privacy operations such as data discovery, DSAR management, consent management, and compliance reporting, targeting privacy teams and enterprises globally. Positioned as a leading solution for compliance with regulations including India's DPDPA, GDPR, and CCPA/CPRA, PrivacyShield leverages modern web technologies and AI to deliver an intuitive and comprehensive privacy management experience. Technically, the website is well-constructed with responsive design, modern CSS frameworks, and structured data for SEO. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain protections, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the company demonstrates strong business credibility with transparent leadership and a clear market focus, though direct contact details are limited to a contact form. The domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with the company's profile and history.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching privacyshield.ai

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PrivacyShield operates in the technology sector, focusing on privacy compliance and management software. Their SaaS business model targets enterprises needing to automate privacy workflows and regulatory compliance. The company benefits from its parent company Plurilock Inc., a publicly listed cybersecurity firm, enhancing credibility and resources. Their competitive advantage lies in AI-driven automation and comprehensive support for multiple global privacy laws, including emerging Indian regulations. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and leadership visibility. Partnerships include Zoho for recruitment and social media channels for outreach. Growth indicators include a recent domain registration and active marketing for demos and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status protections to prevent unauthorized domain changes. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented to comply with privacy laws. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve domain security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. Overall, the security posture is solid for a small tech company but could be enhanced with additional published policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and controls.
  2. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve transparency.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Consider providing direct company contact emails or phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PrivacyShield
Description
PrivacyShield is a comprehensive privacy management solution that simplifies global data privacy compliance. It automates critical privacy tasks such as data discovery, DSAR fulfillment, consent management, and compliance reporting using AI-powered technology.
Key services
Data Discovery, DSAR Management, Consent Management, Cookie Consent, Records of Processing Activities (ROPA), Third-Party Management, Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA), Gap Assessments
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Lucide Icons, Google Fonts (Inter), JavaScript, JSON-LD structured data
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client-side domain status protections (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited)
  • Cookie consent banner with accept/reject/customize options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Unspecified analytics partners
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
analytics partners (unnamed)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered privacy management solutions with compliance to major regulations.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and responsive design.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and include consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified and consistent.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern front-end technologies including Tailwind CSS for styling, Lucide icons for UI elements, and Google Fonts for typography. It includes JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and smooth navigation. Hosting is via GoDaddy registrar with custom DNS servers. Performance appears fast with no broken elements detected. No CMS or backend platform is evident, suggesting a custom or static site approach. The technical implementation is robust with room for minor security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with privacyshield.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review privacyshield.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.