Skip to main content

Security report for prismic.io

Prismic · Technology · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prismic is a well-established technology company founded in 2013, specializing in headless CMS and page builder solutions tailored for developers and marketers. Their platform integrates seamlessly with popular frameworks such as Next.js, Nuxt, and SvelteKit, enabling rapid and scalable website development. The company targets developers, marketers, and agencies, positioning itself as a leader in the headless CMS market with a strong focus on empowering marketing teams to independently create and manage content. Technically, Prismic employs a modern tech stack including React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS, and leverages cloud hosting likely via Vercel and AWS DNS services. The website demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Consent management is handled via Usercentrics, indicating attention to privacy compliance, although explicit privacy and security policies are not prominently published. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and published security or incident response policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, reinforcing legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with enhanced transparency and additional security headers. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on publishing comprehensive privacy, security, and incident response policies, enabling DNSSEC, and implementing security headers to further strengthen the security posture and trustworthiness of the platform.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of prismic.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prismic.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention prismic.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,550
Employees
0
Customers
2,550
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

389 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for prismic.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prismic operates in the SaaS technology sector, providing headless CMS and page builder tools that cater to a growing market demand for flexible, scalable web content management solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in the integration with modern JavaScript frameworks and a dual focus on developer empowerment and marketer usability. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans for their platform, with offerings segmented for developers and marketers. The company maintains an active presence on social media and showcases customer success stories, indicating a healthy growth trajectory and strong community engagement. Strategic partnerships with cloud providers and consent management platforms enhance their ecosystem. The business model emphasizes developer tools and marketing enablement, positioning Prismic as a key player in digital content infrastructure.

Security posture

Prismic demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer lock status. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others suggests room for improvement. No direct evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies was found, which could impact compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2. The use of Usercentrics for consent management indicates some privacy compliance efforts. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected, and no vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security culture appears positive but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service prominently on the website.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure and incident response policy.
  4. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection officer contact and GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NEW PRISMIC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prismic
Description
Prismic is the headless page builder that lets developers and marketers ship and iterate faster, and build sites that just keep getting better.
Key services
Headless page builder, Content management system (CMS), Developer tools (Slice Machine), Page Builder for marketers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS, AWS DNS (Amazon Route 53), Vercel (implied by script), Usercentrics (consent management)
Frameworks
Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms
  2. Strong branding and professional presentation
  3. Focus on headless CMS and page builder tools for developers and marketers
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  5. Limited explicit privacy and security policy disclosures on main site
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible in HTML content
  7. Social media and structured data provide trust signals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and performant technology stack including React, Next.js, and Tailwind CSS, hosted likely on Vercel with AWS DNS services. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with fast loading times and accessibility considerations. The use of Usercentrics indicates integration of consent management tools. The technical implementation reflects a mature and scalable infrastructure suitable for a SaaS platform. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations and policy disclosures to reduce technical debt and enhance trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 65/100 −7Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prismic.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prismic.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.