Skip to main content

Security report for prismic.io

Prismic · Technology · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Prismic is a well-established SaaS company founded in 2013, specializing in headless CMS and page builder solutions tailored for modern web frameworks such as Next.js, Nuxt, and SvelteKit. The company targets developers, marketers, and agencies, enabling them to build scalable, fast, and on-brand websites efficiently. Their market position is strong, supported by positive user reviews and a clear focus on developer and marketer collaboration. Technically, the website leverages modern technologies including React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS, and is likely hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent mechanisms but lacks visible privacy and terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, with room for improvement in privacy transparency and DNS security.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of prismic.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prismic.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention prismic.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,550
Employees
0
Customers
2,550
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

389 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for prismic.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Prismic operates in the technology sector as a SaaS provider of headless CMS and page building tools. Their business model focuses on subscription-based services for web development teams and marketers. The company has a medium size footprint with a clear brand identity and consistent messaging. Their ecosystem includes integrations with popular frameworks and a presence on major social media platforms. The lack of explicit privacy and terms pages suggests an opportunity to enhance compliance and user trust. The company’s domain registration details align well with their business claims, reinforcing legitimacy. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, indicating a focused and clean partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which is a compliance gap. The site uses modern frameworks and asynchronous script loading, reducing attack surface. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but missing privacy and terms pages. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and providing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit security policies and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Referrer-Policy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NEW PRISMIC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prismic
Description
Prismic is the headless page builder that lets developers and marketers ship and iterate faster, and build sites that just keep getting better. It empowers marketers to create on-brand pages fast and integrates with Next.js, Nuxt, and SvelteKit for faster, scalable websites.
Key services
Headless page builder, Headless CMS, Integration with modern frameworks (Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Tailwind CSS, AWS DNS (Amazon Route 53), Vercel (hosting and performance insights script)
Frameworks
Next.js, Radix UI
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No DNSSEC (not enabled)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS frameworks with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Speed Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics (consent management)
Marketing tools
Usercentrics, Vercel Speed Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong brand presence with clear business focus on headless CMS and page builder
  3. Good integration of modern web technologies and frameworks
  4. Security posture is good but could improve DNSSEC and explicit security policies
  5. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent but lacks visible privacy and terms pages
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React, Next.js, and Tailwind CSS, hosted likely on Vercel, which provides excellent performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. The use of asynchronous scripts and modern UI frameworks like Radix UI enhances user experience and performance. No technical debt or legacy technologies were detected. The site integrates cookie consent management via Usercentrics, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, modern, and well-maintained, supporting the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 65/100 −7Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 72/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prismic.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prismic.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.