Skip to main content

Security report for pricing-fox.cz

Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o. · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pricing Fox, operated by Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o., is a specialized SaaS provider focused on automatic pricing optimization for e-commerce businesses primarily in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The platform integrates with major price comparison services and e-shop systems to dynamically adjust product prices, monitor competitors, and protect profit margins. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and strong customer testimonials, positioning Pricing Fox as a trusted player in the e-commerce pricing automation niche. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 11 and leverages modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics, and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and error monitoring via Sentry, but lack explicit security headers and published security policies. From a security and compliance perspective, the site implements cookie consent with granular controls and GDPR-related mechanisms but lacks a visible privacy policy and terms of service pages. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business profile. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional transparency and security headers. The overall risk is low with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and security policies, implementing security headers, and enhancing incident response transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pricing-fox.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pricing Fox operates in the competitive e-commerce SaaS market, focusing on pricing automation and market monitoring. Its integration with Mergado and major Czech/Slovak price comparison platforms provides a competitive advantage. The business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting small to medium e-commerce retailers seeking to optimize pricing strategies and improve market visibility. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem including Mergado and its parent company Profitak Group. Customer testimonials and detailed case studies indicate positive growth and client satisfaction. The company maintains a professional digital presence with active marketing and content updates, signaling ongoing investment in product development and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of modern monitoring tools like Sentry. Cookie consent is implemented with user control over categories, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a visible security policy or incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ04677200
Registration number
04677200
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bidding Fox technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Pricing Fox is an application for automatic pricing optimization for e-shops. It dynamically adjusts product prices based on user-defined rules to maximize competitiveness and profitability, while monitoring market and competitor prices.
Key services
Automatic price optimization, Competitor price monitoring, Visibility improvement on price comparison sites, Margin and profitability protection, Market change alerts, Pricing strategy analytics, Product advertising management, Automation of routine pricing processes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 11, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, Plausible Analytics, Sentry (error monitoring), jQuery, Quicklink, Swiper.js, Mailerlite
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Platforms
Mergado integration
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4, Plausible Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics, CookieHub
Marketing tools
Mailerlite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professionally presented, and targeted at e-commerce businesses.
  3. Strong presence of cookie consent and GDPR-related mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  5. Use of modern technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Good integration with social media and marketing tools.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 11 CMS, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. It uses a combination of JavaScript libraries and services including Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics, CookieHub for cookie consent, Sentry for error monitoring, and Mailerlite for newsletter management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and rich content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack supports scalability and integration with e-commerce platforms, but there is room for improvement in security header implementation and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pricing-fox.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pricing-fox.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.