Skip to main content

Security report for prettypost.io

PrettyPost · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PrettyPost is a small technology company offering a SaaS web application that enables users to create professional social media screenshots quickly and easily. The platform targets content creators, marketers, and social media users who want to enhance their posts with polished visuals. The business model includes a free tier with limited screenshots and a one-time payment Pro plan for unlimited use, positioning it as a niche tool in the social media marketing space. The website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging, supporting a high level of trustworthiness. Technically, the site is built on a modern React and Next.js stack, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. The use of Vercel Analytics and Speed Insights indicates attention to performance and user experience metrics. The site includes structured data for SEO and uses HTTPS exclusively, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in its HTML content. However, it lacks some security best practices such as security headers, a cookie consent mechanism, and published security policies or incident response information. The absence of explicit contact information and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency but does not indicate immediate risk. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional controls and disclosures. The domain WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which is common for small SaaS businesses. This limits direct verification of registrant details but the website's professionalism and business clarity support legitimacy. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content analysis. The site contains no adult or questionable content and is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching prettypost.io

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PrettyPost operates in the technology sector, focusing on social media content enhancement tools. Its competitive advantage lies in ease of use, professional output quality, and a simple pricing model with a lifetime Pro plan. The target customers are content creators and marketers seeking to improve engagement through better visuals. The company appears to be small with no public parent or subsidiary relationships. The presence of a founder's Twitter link suggests a founder-led startup. The business ecosystem includes modern web hosting and analytics providers but no identified partners or affiliates. Growth potential exists in expanding platform integrations and marketing reach. The lack of detailed company registration or physical address information is typical for early-stage SaaS ventures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are notable gaps. No published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No signs of malware, phishing, or other malicious activity were found. The site does not collect sensitive personal data on visible forms, reducing risk exposure. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in formal policies and user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user privacy.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the site against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including a security contact email to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting and user support.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage coordinated security communications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PrettyPost
Description
Create professional social media screenshots in seconds with PrettyPost. Perfect for X/Twitter posts, threads, and share-worthy content.
Key services
Professional screenshot creation, Light & dark themes, Custom backgrounds, High-quality exports, X (Twitter) post import, Multiple platform formats
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics, Vercel Speed Insights
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web Browser
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Marketing tools
Vercel Analytics, Vercel Speed Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on main pages.
  3. Privacy and terms pages are present and linked in footer.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. Site uses modern React/Next.js stack hosted on Vercel.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or security issues visible in HTML.
  8. Social media presence limited to Twitter link of founder.
  9. Pricing model is simple with free and one-time payment Pro plan.
  10. No physical address or company registration info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern React and Next.js framework, hosted on Vercel, which provides fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and content discoverability. Analytics and performance monitoring are implemented via Vercel's own tools. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. The site is well-structured with semantic HTML and meta tags supporting SEO best practices. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated libraries. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance features to further strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with prettypost.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review prettypost.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.