Skip to main content

Security report for praha1.cz

Městská část Praha 1 · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městská část Praha 1 operates an official municipal website serving the Prague 1 district, providing comprehensive information and services to residents, businesses, and visitors. The site features news updates, event calendars, contact information, and access to public administration resources, positioning itself as a key local government communication channel. The website is well-branded and professionally maintained, reflecting its official status. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, various plugins for events and media embedding, and SEO optimizations via Yoast. The site is mobile responsive and performs moderately well, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks some advanced security headers and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The security posture is solid for a government site, with no detected vulnerabilities or malware. Privacy compliance is evident through a comprehensive GDPR policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing trust and user engagement. However, the absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, suggesting a need for further domain verification. Overall, the site is a reliable and authoritative source for municipal information, with strong content quality and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, accessibility, and domain transparency would further strengthen its security and compliance profile.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of praha1.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching praha1.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Prague 1 municipal website serves as a critical communication and service platform for local government operations. Its market position is that of an essential government entity, providing transparency, public service information, and community engagement. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public administration and citizen services. Revenue streams are not applicable, but the site supports local governance through information dissemination and service facilitation. The target customer segments include residents, local businesses, tourists, and public officials. Growth indicators include active event promotion and digital engagement via social media. The partnership ecosystem includes related municipal portals and local service providers. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining digital trust and compliance to support public confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Use of Google Tag Manager is implemented with asynchronous loading, minimizing performance impact. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are visible, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. GDPR compliance is well addressed, but continuous monitoring of third-party scripts and plugins is recommended to mitigate risks. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available and accurate.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městská část Praha 1
Description
Webové stránky Městské části Praha 1. Veškeré informace na jednom místě. Novinky, události a zprávy z Prahy 1.
Key services
Public administration information, Event calendar, Forms and document downloads, Contact and office hours, Social services information, Cultural and sports activities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI, WonderPlugin Slider, YouTube Embed Plus, Events Manager plugin, Yoast SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is official municipal portal for Prague 1 district
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured
  3. Multiple recent news and event updates present
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  6. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to registry or privacy settings
  7. HTTPS is enforced with valid SSL
  8. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  10. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS version 6.8.1, utilizing a range of plugins such as Events Manager, WonderPlugin Slider, YouTube Embed Plus, and Yoast SEO. The front-end relies on jQuery and jQuery UI libraries, with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager scripts for analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential optimization in image loading and script management. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance of plugins and security updates is essential to sustain operational stability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 67/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with praha1.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review praha1.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.