Skip to main content

Security report for praha1.cz

Městská část Praha 1 · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Městská část Praha 1 operates an official municipal government website serving the Prague 1 district. The site provides comprehensive information and services including news, event calendars, administrative forms, contact details, and social services information targeted primarily at residents, local businesses, and visitors. The website is well-branded and professionally maintained, reflecting its role as a trusted government portal. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, and various plugins for events and media embedding. It demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, supported by proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, includes multiple security headers, and uses cookie consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a public security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests areas for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the website presents a low risk profile with strong business credibility and privacy compliance. The lack of WHOIS data is attributed to privacy protection, which is justified for a government entity. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism, and maintaining up-to-date software to sustain security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching praha1.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website firmly positions itself as the official digital presence of the Prague 1 municipal government, serving a medium-sized public sector entity. Its business model focuses on providing transparent access to public administration services, community news, and event information. The portal supports civic engagement and local governance through detailed content and interactive features. Partnerships with local service providers and integration with social media platforms enhance its outreach. The site’s comprehensive content and consistent branding reinforce its authoritative market position within the government sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were identified in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact page limits transparency. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. The site should consider enhancing its security documentation and public communication channels to improve incident response readiness and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user guidance.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts for security-related inquiries.
  5. Continue monitoring and improving accessibility and performance metrics.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Městská část Praha 1
Description
Webové stránky Městské části Praha 1. Veškeré informace na jednom místě. Novinky, události a zprávy z Prahy 1.
Key services
Public administration information, Event calendar, Forms and documents, Contact and office hours, News and announcements, Social services information
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, WonderPlugin Slider, Events Manager plugin, YouTube Embed Plus
Frameworks
jQuery UI
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and cookie consent plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal government website for Prague 1 district
  2. Comprehensive content including news, events, services, and contact information
  3. Strong SEO and accessibility features
  4. Use of modern web technologies and plugins
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  6. Privacy and cookie policies implemented with consent mechanisms
  7. No WHOIS data available, likely due to privacy protection
  8. No visible security or compliance certifications
  9. No public security policy or incident response contact page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages WordPress CMS with a suite of plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WonderPlugin Slider for media display, and Events Manager for calendar functionality. It uses jQuery and jQuery UI libraries for interactive elements. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as ARIA roles and localized date pickers. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in image optimization and script loading. Hosting details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and user-friendly municipal portal.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with praha1.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review praha1.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.