Skip to main content

Security report for powr.io

POWR Inc · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

POWR Inc operates a SaaS platform providing over 60 professional website apps and plugins designed to enhance website functionality without requiring coding skills. The company targets website owners, marketers, and small to medium businesses seeking to improve customer engagement, lead collection, and conversions. With a strong market presence evidenced by over 12 million websites using their apps and thousands of positive reviews, POWR holds a solid position in the website tools industry. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and Content-Security-Policy headers implemented, though additional headers could improve defense-in-depth. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content, which is an area for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for user experience and SEO.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of powr.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching powr.io

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

POWR's business model revolves around offering freemium and paid plans for website apps and plugins, generating revenue through subscriptions and premium features. Their competitive advantage lies in the breadth of apps offered and ease of use without coding. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like shop.pe for e-commerce integrations and G2 for customer reviews, enhancing credibility and reach. Target customers include small to medium businesses and marketers focused on website optimization and customer engagement. Growth indicators include extensive user base and positive customer feedback. The partnership ecosystem is robust with integrations across marketing and analytics tools, supporting a comprehensive digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a strict Content-Security-Policy restricting resource loading to trusted domains. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for enhancement. There is no evidence of a formal security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program publicly available, which could be improved to strengthen security culture and compliance. Data protection practices appear standard but lack explicit documentation. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Add additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and integrations to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
POWR Inc
Description
The easy way to build 60+ professional website apps and plugins for free with no coding required. Collect more leads, get more conversions, and save time.
Key services
Website apps and plugins, Form builders, Popups, Galleries, Payment buttons, Timers, Reviews, Social feeds, Sliders, Tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Calendly, Hotjar, SessionStack, Chatling AI
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict Content-Security-Policy allowing only trusted domains
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer, SessionStack
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Microsoft Advertising, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Clarity, SessionStack, Visual Website Optimizer, G2 Crowd Tracking
Marketing tools
Calendly, Chatling AI
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  4. No explicit contact phone numbers found; only email contact via meta tags.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
  6. Security headers are present but could be enhanced.
  7. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found in the provided content.
  8. Website targets business users needing website apps and plugins.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and optimized performance. Integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by numerous third-party scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party services which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with powr.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review powr.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.