Skip to main content

Security report for plausible.io

Plausible Analytics · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Plausible Analytics is a privacy-focused, lightweight alternative to Google Analytics, founded in 2018 and based in Estonia. The company offers a subscription-based SaaS model alongside an open-source self-hosted option, targeting startups, agencies, creators, and ecommerce businesses. With over 15,000 paying subscribers and a strong emphasis on privacy and GDPR compliance, Plausible positions itself as a trustworthy and sustainable analytics provider in the European market. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies including Jekyll for static site generation and Alpine.js for interactivity. Hosting appears to be provided by Bunny.net, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site is well-structured with comprehensive metadata, SEO optimization, and accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, Plausible enforces HTTPS, uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, and avoids cookies or personal data collection, aligning with privacy best practices. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, representing minor areas for improvement. Overall, Plausible Analytics demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and privacy compliance, making it a reliable choice for privacy-conscious organizations seeking web analytics solutions.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of plausible.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching plausible.io

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
80
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plausible Analytics operates in the technology sector, focusing on privacy-friendly web analytics. Its competitive advantage lies in simplicity, privacy compliance, and open-source transparency. The subscription business model is supported by a loyal customer base of over 15,000 paying users, with clear growth indicators such as high tracked pageviews and uptime. The company maintains an active community presence via blog, GitHub, and social media, fostering trust and engagement. Strategic partnerships are not explicitly listed, but integrations with platforms like WordPress and Looker Studio enhance its ecosystem. The company is self-funded and independent, emphasizing sustainable growth without external investment.

Security posture

The security posture of Plausible Analytics is strong, with HTTPS enforced site-wide and domain registration protections in place. The service avoids invasive tracking methods, uses no cookies, and processes data exclusively within the EU, supporting GDPR compliance. No security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML content, suggesting potential for enhancement. The absence of a published vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy is a gap in transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the security maturity is high for a SaaS provider focused on privacy, but formalizing incident response and enabling DNSSEC would strengthen the posture further.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Implement and advertise security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance browser security.
  5. Continue maintaining transparency and privacy compliance to reinforce trust with customers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Plausible Analytics
Description
Plausible is a lightweight and open-source Google Analytics alternative. Your website data is 100% yours and the privacy of your visitors is respected.
Key services
privacy-friendly web analytics, real-time dashboard, goal and revenue tracking, campaign and SEO performance tracking, team collaboration and sharing, open source analytics platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Jekyll, JSON-LD, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Jekyll
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • no cookies used for tracking
  • privacy by design analytics
  • no personal data collected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics (self-hosted and SaaS)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
excellent

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io own analytics script
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong emphasis on privacy and GDPR compliance.
  3. Open source analytics platform with transparent business model.
  4. Clear and professional design with comprehensive content.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form.
  8. No cookie consent banner needed due to privacy-friendly analytics approach.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern, static site architecture powered by Jekyll, ensuring fast load times and good SEO. Alpine.js is used for lightweight interactivity. Hosting via Bunny.net nameservers suggests reliable CDN-backed infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with comprehensive metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The analytics tracking script is proprietary and privacy-focused, avoiding cookies and personal data collection. No legacy or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, performant, and aligned with best practices for privacy-centric SaaS platforms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
  3. 68/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with plausible.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review plausible.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.