Skip to main content

Security report for planeetta.fi

Planeetta · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Planeetta is a Finnish technology company specializing in domain registration, web hosting, and WordPress maintenance services. Established in 2018, it targets businesses of all sizes within Finland, offering reliable and comprehensive web service solutions. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear service descriptions and customer support channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and accessibility tools, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the domain registration details align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching planeetta.fi

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention planeetta.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
48
Employees
0
Customers
48
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for planeetta.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Planeetta operates in the competitive Finnish web hosting and domain registration market, leveraging a business model focused on recurring revenue from hosting and maintenance subscriptions. Its partnership with entities like Loopia Group enhances its market reach and credibility. The company emphasizes customer support and transparency, with detailed legal and privacy documentation. The target audience includes small to medium enterprises seeking reliable web infrastructure. The presence of testimonials and structured data indicates a mature digital marketing approach. Growth potential lies in expanding managed WordPress services and cloud hosting offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and secure form plugins. However, absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggest room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and enhancing header configurations to strengthen its security posture and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user privacy controls and clearly document data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Planeetta
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Planeetta
Description
Palvelut kaiken kokoisten yrityksien verkkopalveluille. Domain, webhotelli ja kotisivupalvelut. Myös WordPress ylläpito.
Key services
Domain registration, Web hosting, WordPress maintenance, Web service support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Google Tag Manager, AccessiWay accessibility tool
Frameworks
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with custom domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with Contact Form 7

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Trustmary
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear focus on Finnish market with localized content.
  3. Comprehensive service offerings in domain and hosting.
  4. Good use of SEO and structured data.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. Contact and legal information is transparent and accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a standard but effective technology stack. Use of jQuery and Owl Carousel supports interactive UI elements. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. Accessibility is addressed via AccessiWay. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting appears to be managed internally or via a partner, with no explicit CDN detected. Technical debt is minimal, but security header implementation and performance tuning could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium23 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with planeetta.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review planeetta.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.