Skip to main content

Security report for pjk.lv

PATĪKAMA JAUNIEŠU KOMPĀNIJA · E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PATĪKAMA JAUNIEŠU KOMPĀNIJA operates as a small Latvian e-commerce business specializing in branded apparel and accessories. The website is built on the Shopify platform, leveraging its Dawn theme and associated technologies to provide a modern, mobile-optimized shopping experience. The business model currently focuses on pre-order sales with worldwide shipping, targeting a niche audience of brand supporters and young adults. Despite the lack of publicly available WHOIS data, the website presents itself as a legitimate small business with consistent branding and a clear product offering. Technically, the site uses standard e-commerce technologies including Shopify's CDN, JavaScript libraries, and third-party marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. Privacy compliance is addressed through a visible privacy policy and cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, explicit security headers are not clearly declared, and no public security or incident response policies are found. The site does not exhibit any WAF or blocking mechanisms, allowing full content access. Overall, the risk level is moderate with recommendations to enhance security headers and publish incident response information. Strategic recommendations include improving security header implementation, auditing third-party scripts for vulnerabilities, enhancing privacy compliance transparency, and expanding contact information for better business credibility. These steps will strengthen the site's security posture and trustworthiness, supporting sustainable growth in the e-commerce market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pjk.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pjk.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pjk.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche apparel brand with a loyal customer base, leveraging pre-order sales to manage inventory and production. Its use of Shopify indicates a focus on ease of management and scalability. The integration of international shipping and marketing tools suggests ambitions beyond the local market. The absence of detailed company registration data limits deeper business intelligence, but the brand's consistent messaging and social media presence indicate active engagement with its audience. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, relying on digital marketing and online sales channels.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting baseline security and privacy practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of public security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a small e-commerce site but with room for improvement to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures and data retention policies for transparency.
  5. Expand contact information with verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PATĪKAMA JAUNIEŠU KOMPĀNIJA
Description
mēs mīlam sevi, ģimeni un draugus. mēs ejam dabā, un ejam uz reiviem. mēs dzīvojam uz viena akmens, domājot par otra labklājību.
Key services
Online sales of clothing and accessories, Worldwide shipping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Shopify, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Shopify Dawn theme
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Shopify Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (G-16HHRP2ZNH), Facebook Pixel (289872212167415)
Marketing tools
Shopify analytics, Avada SEO, Ultimate Sales Boost
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Shopify-based e-commerce store selling branded apparel and accessories.
  2. Site content is in Latvian with some English locale settings.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via a contact page.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  6. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts.
  7. No evident security headers explicitly declared in HTML source.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or blocking challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Shopify using the Dawn theme, employing modern web technologies such as JavaScript modules, CSS variables, and responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and payment processing. Performance is moderate with CDN usage and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present, including ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and meta tags. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts which require regular security review. The site lacks explicit security headers which should be addressed to improve security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pjk.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pjk.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.