Skip to main content

Security report for pixelrealm.io

Pixel Realm · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PixelRealm is a newly established community-owned omnichain gaming ecosystem focused on advancing Web3 gaming adoption. The platform offers gamers and creators a seamless experience to explore games, trade and stake NFTs, and participate in governance via the Pixel DAO. Supported by reputable blockchain partners such as Binance Labs, Polygon, and Oasis Network, PixelRealm positions itself as an emerging player in the Web3 gaming space. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and domain status locks, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to social media and a subscription form, with no direct company emails or phone numbers disclosed. Overall, PixelRealm demonstrates a solid foundation for a Web3 gaming ecosystem with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pixelrealm.io

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pixelrealm.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for pixelrealm.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

PixelRealm targets the growing Web3 gaming market by providing a community-driven platform that integrates NFT trading, staking, and incubation partnerships. Its business model leverages token governance and partnerships with leading blockchain ecosystems to foster growth and innovation. The company is small and recently founded in 2023, with a focus on onboarding a broad gamer audience into blockchain gaming. The partnership ecosystem includes major players like Binance Labs and Polygon, enhancing credibility and market reach. Revenue streams likely include NFT marketplace transactions, token staking, and incubation grants. The platform's emphasis on community ownership and omnichain interoperability positions it competitively in the evolving blockchain gaming landscape.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Domain registration includes EPP status locks, indicating good domain management practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with no cookie consent mechanism and no vulnerability disclosure policy found. Overall, the security maturity is good for a startup but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Increase direct contact options such as official company emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pixel Realm
Description
PixelRealm is a community-owned omnichain gaming ecosystem focused on Web3 gaming. It offers a platform for gamers and creators to explore games, trade and stake in-game NFTs, watch gameplay reviews, and earn rewards. The mission is to onboard the next billion gamers safely and easily into Web3 gaming.
Key services
Gaming platform, NFT marketplace, Incubator partnerships, Token governance (Pixel DAO), Cross-chain gaming tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Strong focus on Web3 gaming ecosystem with community governance and token integration.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact primarily via social media and subscription form.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite presence of privacy policy.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with business type and age.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Supported by reputable blockchain partners enhancing trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom-built platform. Performance is fast with preloading of key assets and asynchronous script loading. Technical risks are minimal, though the lack of DNSSEC and cookie consent mechanisms are noted. The infrastructure supports scalability and aligns with the needs of a Web3 gaming ecosystem.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pixelrealm.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pixelrealm.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.