Skip to main content

Security report for pixel-puls.de

Pixel-Puls Grafikdesign Werbemittel aus Herrenberg · Other · Germany

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pixel-Puls is a small German graphic design business based in Herrenberg, specializing in creative and professional graphic design services including logo creation, print media, wedding marketing, and web design. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a clear navigation structure, although it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and GDPR cookie compliance, but could be improved by adding security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, serving local clients with a focus on quality and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pixel-puls.de

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pixel-puls.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pixel-puls.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pixel-Puls targets startups, established businesses, and private clients in the Herrenberg region, offering tailored graphic design and marketing services. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on creative solutions and fair pricing. The website content and structured data reinforce the local market positioning and specialization in graphic design and wedding marketing. The absence of detailed registrant WHOIS data slightly reduces transparency but does not indicate suspicious activity. The company leverages popular WordPress plugins and themes to maintain a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a GDPR cookie compliance plugin, demonstrating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap. Security headers are not detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add a terms of service page outlining user rights and obligations.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pixel-Puls Grafikdesign Werbemittel aus Herrenberg
Description
Pixel-Puls: Grafiker für professionelles & kreatives Grafik Design, Werbemittel, Logo Erstellung & mehr aus Herrenberg - Landkreis Böblingen.
Key services
Grafikdesign, Logo Erstellung, Hochzeitsmarketing, Printmedien, Werbetechnik, Webdesign
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.5, Yoast SEO 26.2, Ultimate Addons for Elementor, WPForms Lite, GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, jQuery 3.7.1
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of GDPR cookie consent plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Elementor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional small business site for graphic design services in Germany.
  2. Content is in German language and well structured.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact is via contact form.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Uses modern WordPress plugins and themes with SEO optimization.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.8.3 with Elementor 3.32.5 and Yoast SEO 26.2, indicating a modern CMS and SEO framework. The site loads jQuery 3.7.1 and several Elementor-related CSS and JS assets. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin for consent management. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize privacy and security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pixel-puls.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pixel-puls.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.