Skip to main content

Security report for phpc.chat

PHP Community Foundation · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The PHP Community Chat website serves as a dedicated platform for PHP developers and enthusiasts to engage via popular chat channels such as Discord and IRC. Operated by the PHP Community Foundation, the site supports community building and knowledge sharing within the PHP ecosystem. The platform is positioned as a niche community resource with a clear focus on developer engagement and support. Technically, the website is built with standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript) and hosted on DigitalOcean, ensuring reliable performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could enhance its security posture. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing security headers, represent compliance and security gaps. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which could be improved to strengthen trust and security readiness. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening would enhance its credibility and resilience against emerging threats.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching phpc.chat

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention phpc.chat, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for phpc.chat.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The PHP Community Foundation operates this platform as a community engagement tool targeting PHP developers worldwide, primarily in the US. The business model focuses on fostering open-source community collaboration rather than direct monetization. Key competitive advantages include official backing by the PHP Community Foundation and integration with widely used chat platforms like Discord and IRC. The platform's growth is supported by its clear focus on PHP developers and its partnership with phpcommunity.org. Revenue streams are not evident, suggesting a non-profit or community-supported model. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized community websites and chat services, reinforcing its position as a central hub for PHP community interaction.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are active, reducing risks of domain hijacking. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security limits its defense-in-depth capabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Data protection practices appear minimal due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to meet higher compliance standards like GDPR or NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider adding incident response contact information and formalizing security governance to enhance readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PHP Community Foundation
Description
A community platform dedicated to building and enriching the PHP programming language community by providing chat channels and resources.
Key services
Discord chat channel, IRC chat channel, Community website
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a community chat platform for PHP developers.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. Contact email is provided clearly.
  4. No forms present on the main page; no data collection detected.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  7. Hosting is on DigitalOcean with standard name servers.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Content is professional and relevant to target audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a clean, modern front-end stack using HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without reliance on heavy frameworks or CMS platforms, which contributes to fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. Hosting on DigitalOcean provides a reliable infrastructure base. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates external chat platforms via links rather than embedded widgets, reducing complexity. However, the absence of advanced security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, which simplifies privacy compliance but limits user behavior insights. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a community site but could be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with phpc.chat. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review phpc.chat.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.