Skip to main content

Security report for personyze.com

Website Personalization and Marketing Automation Platform · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Personyze.com is a technology company specializing in website personalization and marketing automation solutions. Their platform leverages machine learning and behavioral targeting to deliver dynamic, cross-channel experiences aimed at increasing user engagement and conversion rates. The website presents a professional and comprehensive overview of their services, targeting marketers and businesses seeking advanced personalization tools. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern web technologies, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly but does not detract from the overall legitimacy of the business presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, adding security policies, and improving transparency around contact and incident response.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of personyze.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching personyze.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Personyze positions itself as an all-in-one platform for personalization, marketing automation, and experimentation, serving a medium-sized technology sector business model. Their key services include recommendation engines, targeted banners, email personalization, dynamic landing pages, and A/B testing. The company targets marketers and enterprises looking to optimize customer engagement through AI-driven personalization. The website content and structured data indicate a consistent brand and a professional market presence, though no explicit founding year or parent company information is available. The ecosystem includes related domains such as their wiki, supporting customer education and integration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are visible, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of GDPR indicators. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a marketing technology platform but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  4. Improve accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity and meet compliance standards.
  5. Verify and publish domain registration details or use verified WHOIS privacy protection to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Website Personalization and Marketing Automation Platform
Description
Real-time personalization engine that uses machine learning and behavioral targeting to deliver dynamic cross-channel experiences that engage and convert.
Key services
Website Personalization, Recommendation Engine, Targeted Banners & Pop-Ups, Email Personalization, Open-Time Email Recommendations, Dynamic Landing Pages, A/B Testing, Social Proof, Account-Based Marketing, Push Notifications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Rocket Lazy Load Scripts, Font Awesome, Happy Elementor Addons, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor Page Builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Personyze internal tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
personyze.com stat-track-lib.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page HTML.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and various plugins.
  6. Content is business-focused on marketing automation and personalization.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  9. Tracking scripts from Personyze domain detected, indicating internal analytics.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and several plugins including Happy Elementor Addons and WPML for multilingual support. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and custom lazy load scripts. The site loads external resources from personyze.com and fetchapiutility.com. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented, but some images show lazy load errors. SEO is supported by All in One SEO Pro plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and typical for marketing SaaS platforms, but there is opportunity to optimize accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with personyze.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review personyze.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.