Skip to main content

Security report for perimeterx.com

HUMAN Security · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HUMAN Security is an enterprise-focused cybersecurity company specializing in protecting digital interactions from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse. Their market position is that of an established provider offering advanced solutions such as bot mitigation, fraud prevention, and invalid traffic detection. The company targets enterprises and internet platforms seeking to secure their digital assets and transactions. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with a WordPress CMS, modern JavaScript frameworks, and integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a high level of digital maturity and marketing sophistication. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although the absence of publicly disclosed incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and security governance. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations, but the lack of WHOIS data limits full trust assessment. Strategic recommendations include publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perimeterx.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HUMAN Security operates in the technology sector providing cybersecurity services primarily to enterprises and internet platforms. Their business model is B2B, focusing on delivering security solutions that mitigate bot attacks and fraud. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics platforms to optimize customer acquisition and engagement. The website content and structured data reflect a strong brand presence and consistent messaging. The absence of detailed company registration or physical address information on the site suggests a focus on digital engagement rather than direct physical presence. The company appears to maintain a robust marketing ecosystem with integrations to major ad networks and tracking services, supporting growth and market penetration. No direct subsidiaries or parent company information is disclosed, indicating an independent or standalone entity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs multiple security best practices including security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response procedures, or vulnerability disclosure programs indicates potential gaps in security governance and transparency. The absence of a security.txt file or dedicated security contact channels may hinder effective incident reporting and response. Overall, the security posture is strong technically but could benefit from enhanced policy disclosures and formalized incident response communication to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide direct security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance transparency around certifications and compliance frameworks to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HUMAN Security
Description
Cybersecurity company that safeguards enterprises and internet platforms from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse.
Key services
Bot mitigation, Fraud prevention, Account abuse protection, Page-level invalid traffic detection, Agentic AI visibility and control
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Marketo, OneTrust, Microsoft UET, Campaign Collector, Hockeystack
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, Marketo, Microsoft UET, Hockeystack, Ahrefs Analytics, Contentsquare
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Heap Analytics, Marketo Munchkin, Demandbase, G2 Crowd, Ahrefs Analytics, Contentsquare, Clicktrax
Marketing tools
Marketo, Heap Analytics, Demandbase, Campaign Collector
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and focused on cybersecurity services.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No direct company phone numbers or emails found in HTML content; contact likely via forms.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  6. Use of multiple modern analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn confirmed via structured data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Alpine.js and multiple asynchronous JavaScript libraries for analytics, marketing, and consent management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. The site integrates advanced marketing tools such as Marketo, Heap Analytics, Demandbase, and Microsoft UET, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified in the provided HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perimeterx.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perimeterx.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.