Skip to main content

Security report for perimeterx.com

HUMAN Security · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HUMAN Security is a cybersecurity company specializing in protecting enterprises and internet platforms from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse. Their Human Defense Platform offers high-fidelity decisioning and precision throughout the customer journey, targeting businesses that require robust digital interaction security. The company maintains a strong market position as an established provider of advanced cybersecurity solutions, focusing on B2B services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including JavaScript frameworks and multiple analytics and marketing integrations, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile-friendly, and accessible, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, indicating good security hygiene. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, and WHOIS data is missing, which slightly impacts trust assessment. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with minor gaps in transparency regarding domain registration and security disclosures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of perimeterx.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perimeterx.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HUMAN Security operates in the technology sector, providing cybersecurity solutions focused on bot mitigation and fraud prevention. Their business model is primarily B2B, targeting enterprises and internet platforms that require protection against automated threats and account abuse. The company leverages a comprehensive marketing and analytics ecosystem, including Marketo, Heap Analytics, and Demandbase, to support customer acquisition and engagement. Their social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook supports brand awareness and customer interaction. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or recent domain registration, which is common in cybersecurity firms to protect sensitive business information. The company appears to be enterprise-sized with a consistent and professional brand image, positioning itself as a leader in adaptive trust and digital interaction security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of security headers, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed with asynchronous loading to reduce performance impact. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy, incident response contact information, and vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and readiness perception. The missing WHOIS data raises minor concerns but is likely due to privacy protection. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing explicit security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. List relevant certifications and compliance frameworks to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HUMAN Security
Description
Cybersecurity company that safeguards enterprises and internet platforms from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse.
Key services
Human Defense Platform, Advertising fraud prevention, Bot mitigation, Account abuse protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, JavaScript, Alpine.js, Google Tag Manager, Heap Analytics, Marketo, OneTrust, Microsoft UET, Campaign Collector, Hockeystack
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Heap Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Microsoft UET, Ahrefs Analytics, Contentsquare
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Heap Analytics, Marketo Munchkin, Demandbase, Bing UET, G2 Crowd, Ahrefs Analytics, Contentsquare, Clicktrax
Marketing tools
Marketo, Heap Analytics, Demandbase, Campaign Collector
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional cybersecurity company website with strong branding and content
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  5. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or domain registration issues
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern JavaScript-based frontend using Alpine.js and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo, Heap Analytics, Demandbase, and Microsoft UET. The site uses Google Tag Manager for tag management and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and preloading of fonts and assets. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence with opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100 −8Medium21 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perimeterx.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perimeterx.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.