Skip to main content

Security report for perfectweb.at

Perfectweb · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Perfectweb is a small regional web design and advertising agency based in Austria, specializing in web design, CMS, graphic design, marketing, and online shop solutions primarily serving Vienna and the Weinviertel region. The website presents a basic but professional digital presence with clear navigation and references to client projects. Technical infrastructure is modest, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with a cookie consent plugin for GDPR compliance. Security posture is limited with no visible HTTPS confirmation or security headers, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain transparency. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced security and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching perfectweb.at

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets small to medium businesses and individuals seeking web design and advertising services in Austria. Their business model is service-based, focusing on full-service solutions including web development, graphic design, and marketing. The presence of multiple client references indicates an active client base and regional market penetration. However, the lack of detailed business registration information and limited contact details may impact credibility. The company appears to maintain partnerships with various online shops and service providers, enhancing its service offerings. Growth potential exists with improvements in digital presence and security.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security awareness through the implementation of a cookie consent banner, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and explicit security or incident response policies suggests a low to moderate security maturity level. No vulnerability disclosures or data protection officer contacts are provided. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trust and transparency. The current security posture exposes the business to potential risks including data interception and lack of incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to secure data transmission.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  4. Enhance contact information with phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  5. Modernize technical stack and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility for better user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Perfectweb
Description
Professionalität und Erfahrung in der Erstellung von Webauftritten, Werbung und Grafikdesign. Werbung, Grafikdesign, Webdesign in Wien und im Weinviertel.
Key services
Webdesign, CMS, Graphic Design, Marketing & Advertising, Online Shops, Online Calculators and Price Calculators
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, CookieConsent plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieConsent plugin by Silktide
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No terms of service or security policies found.
  5. Contact information limited to a single email address; no phone or physical address found.
  6. Website uses outdated charset iso-8859-15 instead of UTF-8.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  9. Website content is basic but relevant to the business.
  10. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including a third-party cookie consent plugin. The charset iso-8859-15 is outdated and should be updated to UTF-8 for better compatibility. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Performance appears moderate but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, limiting usability. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond cookie consent are present, indicating minimal data collection. The absence of security headers and HTTPS status is a technical risk. Overall, the site is functional but outdated and requires modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with perfectweb.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review perfectweb.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.