Skip to main content

Security report for pellar.io

Brickion Technologies Pty Ltd · Technology · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pellar Technology, operated by Brickion Technologies Pty Ltd, is a technology company specializing in building adaptive digital ecosystems leveraging blockchain and AI for enterprises and governments. Their market position is that of a niche provider offering composable infrastructure solutions including mobile wallets, asset exchanges, tokenization, and enterprise blockchain platforms. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using Next.js and Cloudflare DNS, with good mobile optimization and professional design. Security posture is moderate with positive domain registration practices but lacks published security policies and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching pellar.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention pellar.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for pellar.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Pellar targets enterprise and government sectors with a B2B business model focused on blockchain and AI infrastructure. Their key services span finance, utility, and retail blockchain applications. The company was founded in 2018 and is registered in France. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a medium-sized technology firm profile. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, relying on contact forms. No advertising or analytics scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or minimal tracking. The company appears to maintain a secure domain registration and uses Cloudflare DNS for performance and security.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The domain is locked against transfer and uses Cloudflare DNS, but DNSSEC is not enabled. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. The website lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The absence of security and incident response documentation suggests room for improvement in security culture and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Implement and publish security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Consider adding direct contact information for security and support to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brickion Technologies Pty Ltd
Description
Pellar designs and builds composable, future-ready infrastructure to help enterprises and governments adapt to emerging technologies. They specialize in blockchain and AI, creating secure, scalable digital ecosystems that connect users, services, and data. Their offerings include decentralized platforms, modular identity, and asset layers for adaptive ecosystems focused on growth, interoperability, and resilience.
Key services
Mobile Wallet, Asset Exchange, Tokenization, Enterprise Blockchain, Digital Banking, Fractionalization, Digital Payment, Supply Chain, Blockchain Indexer, Market Making Bot
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS for DNS security and performance

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear focus on blockchain and AI technology services.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Contact is available only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Use of Cloudflare DNS and domain transfer lock status are positive security indicators.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with Cloudflare DNS hosting, indicating a contemporary and scalable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate based on image preloading and script async loading. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based site. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA roles and semantic markup. No analytics or advertising scripts were found, which may reduce tracking but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional digital presence with opportunities for enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with pellar.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review pellar.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.